I agree, it's a horrible contract and people should stay far away from it :(
After reading over her terms, the only way she could get away with not having to give a refund is if she stated "No refunds will be given even if no work is provided." If that was agreed to, than she would never have to pay. That is not the case though.
Also, was flipping through my law book (taking several law classes for my major, only reason I know any of this nonsense lol) And that she is in breach of the contract. There is a factor of time in a contract, that it must be completed in a designated time or in a reasonable amount of time depending on the job. It being over two years is not a reasonable time, and there for she is in breach, making it void. :P
Not that I think he would every bring this to court, but always good to know.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-17 10:27 pm (UTC)After reading over her terms, the only way she could get away with not having to give a refund is if she stated "No refunds will be given even if no work is provided." If that was agreed to, than she would never have to pay. That is not the case though.
Also, was flipping through my law book (taking several law classes for my major, only reason I know any of this nonsense lol) And that she is in breach of the contract. There is a factor of time in a contract, that it must be completed in a designated time or in a reasonable amount of time depending on the job. It being over two years is not a reasonable time, and there for she is in breach, making it void. :P
Not that I think he would every bring this to court, but always good to know.