I suspect Paypal's refund function should send the entire amount back, maybe minus the initial fee, without any extra fees. That said.
If artists can't charge extra to cover their fees, should they give extra to cover the fees of a refund to a customer? :/ I can imagine that it feels unfair to be shorted when an artist refunds you, but it also doesn't look good to kick up a lot of dust over £1.57
Odds are the artist has a GOOD reason to refund you, like if they feel they can't give you your work, that you paid for, within a reasonable amount of time, if ever. Or can't give you something of sufficient quality. They might even not be happy about their customer for some reason and no longer feel comfortable doing business with them.
Artists don't refund for funsies, and you have most of your money back, that's more than most people who post here get.
no subject
If artists can't charge extra to cover their fees, should they give extra to cover the fees of a refund to a customer? :/
I can imagine that it feels unfair to be shorted when an artist refunds you, but it also doesn't look good to kick up a lot of dust over £1.57
Odds are the artist has a GOOD reason to refund you, like if they feel they can't give you your work, that you paid for, within a reasonable amount of time, if ever. Or can't give you something of sufficient quality. They might even not be happy about their customer for some reason and no longer feel comfortable doing business with them.
Artists don't refund for funsies, and you have most of your money back, that's more than most people who post here get.