Then it should be noted for readers: I have had very little personal (social) interaction, and NO business interaction, with this group of people at very small conventions (I think the largest was 300ish people). This is all. I was unaware of any bad feelings of them towards me. So these "prior issues" that are brought up and not divulged are 1. news to me and 2. not related to this post.
I think you have the meaning of an enabler wrong. Enablers do not egg people on, I did not say that (again, do not put words in my mouth please). The 2nd link was important because yes, you WERE threatening to withhold it (and it was skullgrrl who told you not to). That was enabling her and was important to show. I have not seen many (or any?) comments calling you her "follower"- if you can, link me there. Most folks do not even mention you guys, they are focused on skullgrrl.
And you really ask why I formed a negative opinion about that thread? Maybe come back and reread it in a week, a month, a year, and see it with different eyes. I also never said I thought you'd resort to violence- just that I do not take that kind of stuff lightly.
no subject
I think you have the meaning of an enabler wrong. Enablers do not egg people on, I did not say that (again, do not put words in my mouth please). The 2nd link was important because yes, you WERE threatening to withhold it (and it was skullgrrl who told you not to). That was enabling her and was important to show. I have not seen many (or any?) comments calling you her "follower"- if you can, link me there. Most folks do not even mention you guys, they are focused on skullgrrl.
And you really ask why I formed a negative opinion about that thread? Maybe come back and reread it in a week, a month, a year, and see it with different eyes. I also never said I thought you'd resort to violence- just that I do not take that kind of stuff lightly.