If you didn't want drama you'd just admit that maybe you were wrong, or apologize, not be passive-aggressive towards this community.

From what I gather, you guys say because the images had to be slightly rotated or resized, that means it doesn't count?

I think I've said this very clearly before, but you don't seem to have understood. You have presented us with short segments lining up generally, but not exactly. These segments are from very vague general areas, as opposed to detailed, specific areas. First there's very little sense to tracing these areas (they're not very hard to draw in the first place), secondly, they are comparative easy to line up with simple scaling/rotation of a similar image. That is exactly what spiffystuff and I did with your art, with similar results. It was to show that there can be some overlap without any tracing or referencing whatsoever. On previous posts, there have been images that are scaled and frankensteined, and while there may be disagreement over how "wrong" that is, there is no disagreement over whether or not it happened. Here most people don't think it happened, even when scaled and rotated. Your evidence is not convincing due to a lack of similarity even when scaled and rotated.