I don't think its right that someone is going to get a warning for overlays which were squished/stretched to fit. Even if you did not do it intentionally, it has been shown clearly that there is some form of manipulation that happened to the images in the overlays, therefore it is not "real" proof because the images DO NOT line up without the manipulation that occurred.
Whether it was an accident or not... I think it's wrong that this person is going to get in trouble for this now, when the evidence was manipulated. If the manipulation was negligible and it still lined up with or without it, it'd be one thing... but they don't line up without it.
no subject
Whether it was an accident or not... I think it's wrong that this person is going to get in trouble for this now, when the evidence was manipulated. If the manipulation was negligible and it still lined up with or without it, it'd be one thing... but they don't line up without it.