http://jeiwolf.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] jeiwolf.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] artists_beware2012-01-12 02:52 am
Entry tags:

Beware: Sin.

WHO: Sin.

WHERE: http://www.furaffinity.net/user/sin.

WHAT: Originally, a commission of 10 chibi's. Eventually changed to 2 sketch pages for artist convenience. Changed again to a single piece for artists convenience.

WHEN: November 15th, 2010 - January 12, 2012

PROOF: The original agreement on November 15th, 2010 where Sin. accepted $40 for 10 fully colored pictures.
http://i1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc496/Carrotwolf/Sinevidence2.png

EXPLAIN: Originally, Sin. was hard up for money and needed quick buck to help her out with some things. I had some expendable cash and had recently discovered her, so I thought I could help out and get some art along the way. By November 20th she had accepted my ideas and was to begin work on the pieces ( http://i1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc496/Carrotwolf/Sinevidence3.png ).

From that date, all of the interaction between Sin. and myself took place over messengers where it was easier to quickly communicate ideas. She finished pieces from others who commissioned her from the same journal as I did and even started taking more commissions both from journals and livestreams. She claimed that she would work on mine, but I never was shown any progress nor would she work on them in public view for me to see. I was careful not to be belligerent, however, and did not push her too harshly to finish them. Now and then I would reminder her that she still owed me things only to be met with "Oh I know! I haven't forgotten about you!", but it yielded no actual results.

For the next few months this went on, asking for updates and reminding that she still owed me work while she continued to take and finish others commissions right before my eyes, but she said that so many pictures were too difficult. So I agreed for the sake of getting SOMETHING for my money to condense it all down into two sketch pages instead of 10 fully colored pieces. This was completely for Sin.'s convenience. More months pass and despite claims of having a full page completed, no progress was shown physically. Eventually after a lapse of contact I sent a note to ask how the sketches were going at which point she admitted to being behind and opted instead to give me 5 pieces of art fully colored ( HALF of the original amount ) for my troubles. ( http://i1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc496/Carrotwolf/Sinevidence4.png And http://i1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc496/Carrotwolf/Sinevidence5.png ).

I stated that I would tell her precisely what I wanted at a later date, since I wasn't exactly sure at this point what to commission. Things stayed this way for a couple of weeks until my girlfriend and I chose what we wanted. The idea of a five person commission, despite her request to only have 3 per pictures, was given to her with the perk of it being the only picture she would have to complete to fulfill her duty to me. At first she accepted, but once confronted with the idea of drawing it decided it would be too difficult and backed down. Several more days pass and I allow my girlfriend some of the slots that I didn't know how to use to get a reference sheet. She knew the details better than I would, so I had her contact Sin. directly. Sin. denied my girlfriend without attempting to contact me based on the fact that they were my slots.

This all leads to January 12, 2012 when she sent me this note with no provocation from myself. Needless to say, I was surprised to see it pop up in my inbox. ( http://i1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc496/Carrotwolf/Sinevidence6.png ). Of course, having been as patient as I was ( even recognized by herself at one point ) this felt like a kick in the gut. Finally we work out the deal to do the original idea that I had come up with for the 5 person commission and that would fulfill her obligation to me.

She insisted on doing this commission immediately to get it out of the way. I had things to take care of and it was getting very late, so my girlfriend handled the details for me. Immediately she continued her rude attitude and made things very difficult to the very end.

It is obvious from looking at the piece that her normal care was not put into it and it was finished in under an hour after over a year of waiting. ( http://i1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc496/Carrotwolf/beecarcommission.png ). No background, sloppy lines, hardly adding ANY detail.

Finally, as soon as she finished the commission, she posted a journal about her experience with "us" and showing her true emotion and attitude. ( http://i1214.photobucket.com/albums/cc496/Carrotwolf/Sinevidence8.png ).

I do a lot of commissioning and this is the worst experience I have ever had. Stay FAR away from this artist.
ocelotish: A girl with an ocelot on her shoulders (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] ocelotish 2012-01-17 06:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that's something that's really hard to judge without the logs. It depends a lot on the manner of how it was done. Even if done nicely, I can still understand being miffed when a person is participating in an auction with apparently no intention to pay the amount they bid.

Someone's been extremely patient with me then I loose my @#$@# because they inquire about a work around? No.

This wasn't the commissioner, it was the girlfriend. It's hard to tell, but I'm not sure the artist was even aware that the commissioner was giving a slot to the girlfriend before this incidence.

(frozen comment)

[identity profile] spiffystuff.livejournal.com 2012-01-17 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I just don't see how any of that justifies the 'tude seen in the letter to the OP.
I mean it's not the worst ever, but it's just not the way you start talking to a customer who's been waiting a year and who's SO may or may not have done something a little out of line, you know? I'd start off with an open ended "hey, can you tell me what was up with this ____?"
ocelotish: A girl with an ocelot on her shoulders (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] ocelotish 2012-01-17 06:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree, the note to the OP was unprofessional and said as much elsewhere. However, I can understand being harsher with the girlfriend.

(frozen comment)

[identity profile] spiffystuff.livejournal.com 2012-01-17 06:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I wasn't putting too much weight on the exchange with beepuppy since we can't see the exact convo. Same with what the "deleted journal" was about.

I mean I can see why the artist would be annoyed I just don't think they have the right to take it out on anyone, even beepuppy (though as I said, there's no proof of the artist acting up against beepuppy, just OP). Somehow I imagine it was more this issue being brought up on stream (publicly) that pissed the artist off.
Edited 2012-01-17 18:42 (UTC)
ocelotish: A girl with an ocelot on her shoulders (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] ocelotish 2012-01-17 06:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think it was necessarily commendable to take it out on beepuppy; however, that's a much more reasonable reaction, especially when we don't have the logs.

Something like "I was hoping to use one of jeiwolf's slots" can be asking to beepuppy, but to the artist might say "I wasn't intending to pay real money." I'd be pretty mad at someone attempting to use a $4 slot that isn't theirs to pay for a $15 auction that they bid against other people on.

(frozen comment)

[identity profile] spiffystuff.livejournal.com 2012-01-17 07:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Like I said, it's on the artist if they flipped their poop over something like that. Beepuppy says they were just asking and intended to pay; we can't see the convo but unless beepuppy is lying outright, that's just another example of the artist getting preemptively outraged and shooting themselves in the foot.
ocelotish: Katara looking angry with the text "Bloodbender" (Katara - Bloodbender)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] ocelotish 2012-01-17 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
You completely missed my point. >.>

My example was demonstrating that beepuppy could have been telling the truth and been polite in a way where we could still understand the artist reading it as beepuppy trying to pull a fast one, and yes, I can understand the artist getting upset with that.

(frozen comment)

[identity profile] spiffystuff.livejournal.com 2012-01-17 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)
No, I understand your point, I'm saying it doesn't matter if it is understandable that the artist might feel annoyed? Because unless Beepuppy did something that was UNQUESTIONABLY shady the artist should have swallowed their kneejerk feelings and dealt with it calmly, figured out what was up.
ocelotish: A girl with an ocelot on her shoulders (Default)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] ocelotish 2012-01-17 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)
My point is that it is shady to try to use a $4 slot for a $15 auction, no matter what, especially when it's not your slot. Given that we have no evidence that the artist knew beepuppy had permission to use the OP's slot, it's very shady.

We don't have the logs, but it's very unfair to assume that the artist lost it over nothing. What we know is that beepuppy wanted to use a $4 slot that wasn't hers, to pay for a $15 auction, but was ultimately willing to pay for it straight. Other than that, we have to remember that there are three sides to every story (and I don't mean that as a knock against beepuppy, at all). Because we don't have the log, we have to ask "Could what beepuppy said be true, but come across very differently to the artist?" For me, the answer was yes, as I demonstrated in my example.

That doesn't excuse the angry note to the OP, obviously.

(frozen comment)

[identity profile] spiffystuff.livejournal.com 2012-01-17 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)
*shrug* We'll have to agree to disagree. Me, I don't think it was done on purpose to be snarky but find it almost a funny response to an artist who continues to take commissions when they have one that's backlogged over year.
ocelotish: Katara looking angry with the text "Bloodbender" (Katara - Bloodbender)

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] ocelotish 2012-01-17 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't understand your response at all!

I never said that beepuppy did it to be snarky, I don't think she was rude when asking about this, I don't think she was dishonest in this post, etc. I was saying there were ways for her to be completely polite, but the situation was still shady enough for the artist to react badly and be justified in doing so.

[I] find it almost a funny response to an artist who continues to take commissions when they have one that's backlogged over year.

I really fail to see how any of this is funny. You seem to be projecting a lot onto this artist. Earlier you were talking about how it was doubtlessly because it was done in public, not in private. This comment explains in part why it's so inappropriate in the first place.

(frozen comment)

[identity profile] kayla-la.livejournal.com 2012-01-17 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Alright, this is going in circles and you guys are starting to get frustrated with each other, so I'm freezing this here. If you want to continue it you're of course welcome to take it to PMs.