![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
(no subject)
WHO: Kee/Kyme/Inarolyn/Iaz/Janks/Len/Neicom
WHERE: http://www.furaffinity.net/user/kee (all the above are also FA accounts that she has hopped between, but Kee is her current).
WHAT: Tracing. Most of the traces are partial and have been "frankensteined".
WHEN: This has been going on for awhile from what I have been able to figure.
EXPLAIN: Again, I was asked to post this here by several people after compiling multiple instances of her tracing of recent. A lot of people felt a public warning should be made, since she jumps accounts quite frequently. She's also traced several times in the past, but I haven't been able to locate the originals.
As an example, this is art from five-six months ago that she drew while living with me:
http://i44.tinypic.com/jzodv.jpg
http://i41.tinypic.com/jgo415.jpg
http://i43.tinypic.com/jt5hj5.png
She's never traced while living with me because I had gotten onto her in the past for copying other artists.
These are the traces I've found evidence of:
First example:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6820740/
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6820732/ [NSFW]
Traced from:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6595400/ [NSFW]
Overlay:
http://i44.tinypic.com/s1kksm.jpg [NSFW]
Second example:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6894553/
Traced from:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6577848/ [NSFW]
Overlay:
http://i42.tinypic.com/25r1sh1.png [NSFW]
Third example:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6898927
Traced from:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6703170/
Overlay:
http://i39.tinypic.com/otfbcw.jpg
http://i41.tinypic.com/34r617b.jpg
Fourth example:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6898413
Traced from:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6057168/
Overlay:
http://i42.tinypic.com/fljxvr.jpg
http://i41.tinypic.com/14m5abk.jpg
Fifth example:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6898388
Traced from:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6789179/
Overlay:
http://i42.tinypic.com/2ppzyx4.jpg
Sixth example:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6807846/
Traced from:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/5060030/
Overlay:
http://i42.tinypic.com/yyp01.jpg
Edit:
Got shown these ones last night:
Seventh example:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6898399 [NSFW]
Traced from:
http://i42.tinypic.com/aekvg5.png [NSFW]
Overlays:
http://i41.tinypic.com/ohis69.jpg [NSFW]
http://i42.tinypic.com/2a7v9c4.png [NSFW]
http://i42.tinypic.com/wsw93q.png [NSFW]
Eighth example:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6811551/
Traced from:
http://i40.tinypic.com/zupcli.png [NSFW]
Overlays:
http://i44.tinypic.com/350nrxh.jpg [NSFW]
http://i44.tinypic.com/1042nn6.jpg [NSFW]
http://i44.tinypic.com/kdx5b8.jpg [NSFW]
Almost all the traces have been of artists whom she's watching, the only exception being my own art.
Suspected traces:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6852690/ [NSFW]
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6898425/ [NSFW]
http://i44.tinypic.com/xdruq0.jpg (from 2010) [NSFW]
http://i42.tinypic.com/14kifzn.jpg (from 2010) [NSFW]
There were a few others that were TCBY commissions that I am certain were traced, but I never saved the files.
As is evidenced, her anatomy flipflops from really well done, to filled with errors. If anyone can provide originals for some of the suspected traces, it'd be appreciated as well. NO ONE improves that greatly in a five month period, drawing as rarely as she does. I don't think everything she uploads/draws is traced, but much of it is.
Edit: Here's some more overlays with varying opacity's to give a clearer idea of where the lines are a perfect match.
http://i44.tinypic.com/206fmvt.jpg
http://i42.tinypic.com/2s9alas.jpg
http://i43.tinypic.com/2gw7v3o.jpg [nsfw]
http://i43.tinypic.com/1j9nit.jpg [nsfw]
Edit2:
I'm redacting my allegations of tracing, as I really don't want to be involved in any drama with this person to start with.
Edit3: I'm sorry, to make it more clear, I am retracting my allegations as there isn't sufficient evidence of tracing going on. I have posted apologies here and on FA.
Fixed overlays with proper aspect ratio:
http://i44.tinypic.com/rhj09f.jpg
Here it is in 3 different colors, still matching in the same areas. (I rotated it quickly, so it's not the exact same as the other overlays, but I'm too tired to redo all this again just to be perfect for the naysayers).
http://i39.tinypic.com/r0vw4h.jpg
http://i43.tinypic.com/de6ycw.jpg
http://i43.tinypic.com/mil4kh.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/nvnzx4.jpg
http://i43.tinypic.com/15i9g8j.png
There is no WAY any of the above have been distorted, as I did use the shift key as I was told.
Re: My Personal Breakdown of the New Overlays
I am curious when circumstantial evidence is admissible. In a court of law, it doesn't take much to get a conviction. While I'm not saying that this IS a court, I am still curious of how many lines must match before it's looked at seriously.
Again, you're bringing up my past as if it has relevancy to this post when it does not. (If you're going to lambast me over it, at least don't pretend as if your intentions are genuine.)I've said it before, and will say it again, I was asked to pursue posting here by other people who felt it was necessary. I didn't want to make it public until I had more solid evidence or more instances of partial traces.
Re: My Personal Breakdown of the New Overlays
Your circumstantial evidence is the equivalent of a couple lines of a partial fingerprint. Sure, some of them are going to line up, but it's not enough to bring a solid conviction. You need more damning evidence than what you've presented to convince many of us in this community.
The poses are generic and similar in style. It's not that hard to line up one or two lines and say they match, especially when they are sketchy and are so bold that the chances of the lines matching up are higher.
You're free to believe what you want to believe, but many of us have made up our mind. I personally do not believe there is enough evidence because I could literally take any similar posed picture from any artist, and force a line or two to line up. The humanoid body can only be manipulated into so many figures.
Re: My Personal Breakdown of the New Overlays
Re: My Personal Breakdown of the New Overlays
As I said before though, the human figure can only be bent so far before looking broken. Having a good understanding of anatomy is going to make many lines add up without any tracing or referencing involved.
From my point of view from this particular situation, at best, it's a coincidence. At worst, I'd lean more towards reference than a direct trace.
Re: My Personal Breakdown of the New Overlays
Re: My Personal Breakdown of the New Overlays
It's different because it is easy. There are no knobby joints, there is little structure showing that cannot be ignored and have a relatively successful piece, in most of these examples there is no perspective, it is easiest to get the torso in proportion as it has major landmarks at the space of one head. There is comparatively little style to these torsos. In comparison, the head and hands are difficult for even skilled artists to handle (why do you think they're the most abstracted in cartoons?)
Again, you're bringing up my past as if it has relevancy to this post when it does not. (If you're going to lambast me over it, at least don't pretend as if your intentions are genuine.)I've said it before, and will say it again, I was asked to pursue posting here by other people who felt it was necessary. I didn't want to make it public until I had more solid evidence or more instances of partial traces.
No, I was bring up how you've behaved in this post and your FA journal. Without knowing your past (I still don't), nor do I care, you have taken every disagreement, no matter how civilly personally, you've badmouthed the community, and have whined incessantly. That's not how you (gen) behaves when you don't have a dog in the fight. You have taken everything in this post personally whether or not there is any mention to your "past."
Re: My Personal Breakdown of the New Overlays
It's actually really hard to get a conviction, especially in criminal court if it's run correctly. It would have to be beyond a reasonable doubt, which it's not, or if we're going by copyright law, it has to be clear to an outside observer what the piece is based on to be non-derivative work, which I'm personally not convinced of either.
As for how many lines - I gave you an idea of what makes something definitively traced in a picture elsewhere. You have about a third of what I'd look at, if that.
Re: My Personal Breakdown of the New Overlays
I do hope that she takes this as a warning to not trace or heavily reference others art so much in the future.
Re: My Personal Breakdown of the New Overlays
Re: My Personal Breakdown of the New Overlays