It's kind of like the earthquake mentioned in an earlier post. If the person in question claimed an earthquake has make it impossible to complete something, resulting in no communication/lack of end product/etc -- wouldn't you want to know there was actually an earthquake?
If this were to somehow escalate to a legal claim, it would be well within the rights (and probably expected by any small claims judge) that the accuser know for sure that there wasn't any weather-inclined reason that the accused couldn't contact them.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2012-05-06 12:23 pm (UTC)If this were to somehow escalate to a legal claim, it would be well within the rights (and probably expected by any small claims judge) that the accuser know for sure that there wasn't any weather-inclined reason that the accused couldn't contact them.