In relation to:
http://community.livejournal.com/artists_beware/96779.html
I recently commented on a journal entry on the journal
gibbet, noticing a fairly recent post and thinking 'hey, well, she's obviously alive...', and mentioned my commission, asking if she was planning on finishing it, and if not, I'd like a full refund.
She deleted me from her livejournal.
This kind of avoidance is really kind of well... rude, for one. If she owed me an art trade, I'd be less inclined to try and keep up with it, but I paid money for this. Wasted money that could have been put towards art by a more reliable and deserving artist.
I guess I'd just like to say to anyone who gets put to her emo tirade of 'oh I'm soooo poor' etc etc does not commission her, because you'll be hard pressed to get your money's worth, and she'll avoid you like the plague.
http://community.livejournal.com/artists_beware/96779.html
I recently commented on a journal entry on the journal
She deleted me from her livejournal.
This kind of avoidance is really kind of well... rude, for one. If she owed me an art trade, I'd be less inclined to try and keep up with it, but I paid money for this. Wasted money that could have been put towards art by a more reliable and deserving artist.
I guess I'd just like to say to anyone who gets put to her emo tirade of 'oh I'm soooo poor' etc etc does not commission her, because you'll be hard pressed to get your money's worth, and she'll avoid you like the plague.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 01:19 am (UTC)It isn't so much about the money (although I am a college student and that money could have gone towards books or gas...) but the principle is...mind blowing.
I hope that your situation works out for you in the end.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 01:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 02:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 06:46 am (UTC)Deleted you from her live journal...hoooo boy. We have a winner here.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 06:49 am (UTC)Based on previous events it LOOKS like she's getting ready to pull the whole "im not a girl im a teenage boy and my name is such and such, what are you talking about?" thing again, since she tends to do that right beforehand.
Argh. Lame. :C
no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 08:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 11:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 03:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 03:52 pm (UTC)I want to know the details before I start building a gigantic Do Not Go Over There reminder/fortress.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 03:59 pm (UTC)then she purged her journal and this person became a 15 or so year old boy, picking up the "story" of their life like nothing had changed.
Then this entity disappeared after yet ANOTHER purge, and up cropped this young lady that she is currently.
Awhile ago during the whole "man phase" I knew several people who were privy to the knowledge that she was actually 27 and a female.
So basically she constantly changes her online identity but keeps the name and fursonas, but the human behind it is different everytime. Sort of like a phoenix personality...she destroys "herself" and rises up anew.
Its really lame and has alienated a lot of her commissioners, friends, and fans, myself included. I don't wish to associate with someone who refuses to be honest.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 04:10 pm (UTC)Fuckin scheisty shit.
Now I'm real curious what's behind all that, goddamnit. Must get that do-not-study-people-on-LJ reminder tattooed on my hands or something...
no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 05:31 pm (UTC)Much harder to get ripped off this way. The most I'm ever out is a promised commission.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-10 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-11 01:08 am (UTC)That was almost 6 months ago. And she refuses to answer my e-mails. :(
no subject
Date: 2006-09-11 01:13 am (UTC)Besides, I like supporting the artists. I just dislike being hosed in a busniess transaction.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-11 04:17 am (UTC)* Commissioner and artist discuss what should be done, and they both send information to the escrow service within the service's guidelines
* Commissioner sends money to the escrow service
* Artist does work, sends work to commissioner
* Escrow service sends money to the artist.
Of course, there's still the issue of the artist proving the work is being sent, and that the work followed the original agreement, but I'm assuming that whoever runs the service knows what kinds of proof is required, and what should be specified in the agreement.
Getting the right stuff down in writing, in the agreement, I'm sure is half the problem. The other half is ensuring that payment crosses over delivery properly :)
Now... who could we find that both artists and commissioners would trust?
no subject
Date: 2006-09-11 11:04 am (UTC)Besides, no one would do it for free
no subject
Date: 2006-09-11 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-09-11 09:30 pm (UTC)because nothing's free.
no subject
Date: 2006-09-11 09:50 pm (UTC)