Impatient commissioners, and... more?
Apr. 11th, 2007 12:08 pmBack in January I was commissioned by an individual for some livejournal icons, for the amount of $8. When the commissioner sent the money, they knew full well that I have a severe genetic disability that keeps me from drawing much in certain conditions (cold, wet, etc). I had been holding off on doing any of my digital commissions until it had warmed up some so that I could provide the highest quality work, instead of something done with half-effort. Every commissioner I have ever had has understood completely and been more than glad to wait for their work, except for this one specific person.
Now, about a month ago, I had a severe problem with my computer and had to re-install my OS. This caused me to lose the drivers for all my installed hardware, as well as all of my software. I've managed to replace everything except the driver to my PCI serial card. I have posted several times in my livejournal about this, and the commissioner has even replied to the entry saying he was fine with waiting and for me to take my time, that he understood computer trouble.
Then, only five days later, I find this waiting for me when I get up:
(8:21:49 AM) Ridayah: Banrai, I see you've got your away STILL up, but I'm going to IM you here.
(8:21:49 AM) Banrai: (away) I'm not here right now, so cry me a river, build me a bridge, and get over it.
(8:22:18 AM) Ridayah: I don't know what's going on, and at this point I'm just kinda running out of patience.
(8:22:40 AM) Ridayah: If you can't finish the icons by Friday, could you please refund the money? Thanks.
Ok, so you're impatient. Great. So I have refunded this fellow's money, but needless to say I would not recommend doing business with him. Not only for his obvious impatience even when he knew beforehand that the commission could take quite a while. But, more specifically, this individual seems to have a problem with keeping a relationship business oriented. What am I talking about?
On several occasions this commissioner tried to get promiscuous with me, even after knowing I was married. And even after telling me he has a girlfriend. For a small example;
(4:58:56 AM) Ridayah: *giggles, wriggling free and giving you a big tight hug, giving sloppy kisses on your cheek* She's back, yay! ^__^
(5:01:06 AM) Ridayah: Banrai hun? *noses at your cheek, wondering if you got called away from the screen or if you're in pain or hurt*
(5:01:17 AM) Banrai: Sorry, got distracted by a cat ;D
(5:01:28 AM) Ridayah: ah, okay. Kitties are good excuse. ^^
(5:01:43 AM) Banrai: *gives you three*
(5:01:45 AM) Ridayah: *giggles, giving another sloppy kiss then rubbing his nose in your fur, taking big whiffs of your scent, purring* You're nice.
(5:01:52 AM) Ridayah: Eeeee! *cuddles them all* ^^
(5:02:06 AM) Ridayah: kittties! *puts one on his head, one between his wings, and one on his rump*
(5:02:13 AM) Banrai: Am not! Just happy with kitties and good friends. ;0
(5:02:54 AM) Ridayah: You are nice, at least I think so. *purrips, nudging his way under your wing and snuggling against your side, nibbling your fur gently and comfortingly, his tail swaying softly*
(5:03:47 AM) Banrai: bah.
(5:04:29 AM) Ridayah: mwar! You're pretty, and you're nice, and you're pretty nice too. ^^ *purrs deeply, rising up a bit and using a paw to rub under a wing gently*
Just.... ugh. Disgusting, sorry I don't want to be textrubated today.
So if you have any dealings with
ridayah, beware what you might be getting into.
-edit-
And, just as a note, comments on this entry WERE screened. I felt I should come say this since it is apparent that several of this person's supporters are having fits over it. I prefer to reply to comments before another has a chance, and before I get a chance to have a reply there's a million replies to one comment. Since such an uproar has been caused by that, comments are open.
Now, about a month ago, I had a severe problem with my computer and had to re-install my OS. This caused me to lose the drivers for all my installed hardware, as well as all of my software. I've managed to replace everything except the driver to my PCI serial card. I have posted several times in my livejournal about this, and the commissioner has even replied to the entry saying he was fine with waiting and for me to take my time, that he understood computer trouble.
Then, only five days later, I find this waiting for me when I get up:
(8:21:49 AM) Ridayah: Banrai, I see you've got your away STILL up, but I'm going to IM you here.
(8:21:49 AM) Banrai: (away) I'm not here right now, so cry me a river, build me a bridge, and get over it.
(8:22:18 AM) Ridayah: I don't know what's going on, and at this point I'm just kinda running out of patience.
(8:22:40 AM) Ridayah: If you can't finish the icons by Friday, could you please refund the money? Thanks.
Ok, so you're impatient. Great. So I have refunded this fellow's money, but needless to say I would not recommend doing business with him. Not only for his obvious impatience even when he knew beforehand that the commission could take quite a while. But, more specifically, this individual seems to have a problem with keeping a relationship business oriented. What am I talking about?
On several occasions this commissioner tried to get promiscuous with me, even after knowing I was married. And even after telling me he has a girlfriend. For a small example;
(4:58:56 AM) Ridayah: *giggles, wriggling free and giving you a big tight hug, giving sloppy kisses on your cheek* She's back, yay! ^__^
(5:01:06 AM) Ridayah: Banrai hun? *noses at your cheek, wondering if you got called away from the screen or if you're in pain or hurt*
(5:01:17 AM) Banrai: Sorry, got distracted by a cat ;D
(5:01:28 AM) Ridayah: ah, okay. Kitties are good excuse. ^^
(5:01:43 AM) Banrai: *gives you three*
(5:01:45 AM) Ridayah: *giggles, giving another sloppy kiss then rubbing his nose in your fur, taking big whiffs of your scent, purring* You're nice.
(5:01:52 AM) Ridayah: Eeeee! *cuddles them all* ^^
(5:02:06 AM) Ridayah: kittties! *puts one on his head, one between his wings, and one on his rump*
(5:02:13 AM) Banrai: Am not! Just happy with kitties and good friends. ;0
(5:02:54 AM) Ridayah: You are nice, at least I think so. *purrips, nudging his way under your wing and snuggling against your side, nibbling your fur gently and comfortingly, his tail swaying softly*
(5:03:47 AM) Banrai: bah.
(5:04:29 AM) Ridayah: mwar! You're pretty, and you're nice, and you're pretty nice too. ^^ *purrs deeply, rising up a bit and using a paw to rub under a wing gently*
Just.... ugh. Disgusting, sorry I don't want to be textrubated today.
So if you have any dealings with
-edit-
And, just as a note, comments on this entry WERE screened. I felt I should come say this since it is apparent that several of this person's supporters are having fits over it. I prefer to reply to comments before another has a chance, and before I get a chance to have a reply there's a million replies to one comment. Since such an uproar has been caused by that, comments are open.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-11 09:44 pm (UTC)I would have stopped to strangle him right then. That convo was painful to read.
Curious!
Date: 2007-04-11 09:48 pm (UTC)Re: Curious!
Date: 2007-04-11 09:54 pm (UTC)Re: Curious!
From:Re: Curious!
From:Re: Curious!
From:Re: Curious!
From:Re: Curious!
From:Re: Curious!
From:Re: Curious!
From:Re: Curious!
From:Re: Curious!
From:Re: Curious!
From:Re: Curious!
From:Re: Curious!
From:Re: Curious!
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-11 10:02 pm (UTC)Have you told him to knock it off though? I've had the same problem with some of my customers and most got the hint when I told them "I'm sorry, I'm not comfortable with this level of intimacy."
It sucks that you have to say it, but alas.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-11 10:13 pm (UTC)I'm sure they'll just blame aspergers or whatever the current fad is for excuses.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-11 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-11 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-11 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-11 10:14 pm (UTC)UNG NO GTFO PLZ
And then they get all upset when I ask them (nicely) to stop because I'm taken. They tell me I'm too sensitive and not to take things on the internet seriously-- No... no. I just don't need to tolerate fans humping my leg every two seconds.
Another good one is "Oh I have multiple mates! You should be more open with other furs! lolmurrr!" In translation, "Cheat on your loving boyfriend you've been with for nearly a year with some random faggots on the internet!"
My response to them, "Enjoy your aids".
no subject
Date: 2007-04-11 11:00 pm (UTC)That's awful. They obviously have no sense of respect.
You know, it's pretty sad when there is even no longer respect for monogamous relationship... ¬_¬
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-11 11:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-11 11:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 12:22 am (UTC)And the other log snippet has what to do with this, out of curiosity? You could have told him right then that you were uncomfortable. To me, this looks more like a personal issue than a business issue. I don't see much of a reason for this post, honestly.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 05:59 pm (UTC)I'm sorry you don't see a reason for the post. Of course, not being involved in the situation you wouldn't have the same outlook that myself and the others that I discussed this with before I came here do.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 12:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 02:09 am (UTC)Personal opinions aside, he sounds delusional and dramatic. Refunding him and severing all contact on messengers and LJ seems to be the best course of action...
Too bad many furries just freakin' crave that free love, sex, swinger attitude of typefucking and "loving" their "friends" just a wee bit too much. Blech! My point being, he'll have no shortage of supporters and friends that will willingly pat his back and all that.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 02:14 pm (UTC)Sexual harrassment is defined as unwanted sexual attention, and since what Banrai typed there was really just typical animalistic, furry-style affection (I get it from a few people and just ignore it), there's no way to know over AIM whether it was unwanted unless she asked him to stop and said why.
Let's try to avoid smearing names beyond the necessary here, eh? :)
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 06:17 pm (UTC)I had no problem refunding this fellow his money. THe problem I have is that not only was he very un-communicative with me, but as well that he chose to go to an unrelated party, instead of straight to me with his problems. The problem I have is that he quickly became wishy-washy over the entire ordeal. Again, as I said, I had no problem refunding him. I'm just upset at how he chose to handle the situation.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 06:04 pm (UTC)The issue here is not that the troubles are the commissioner's responsibility. The issue is that when I take a commission I lay out exactly how I work, and make sure that the person is aware that it could take some time. If they're not ok with that, then they simply choose not to commission me. Even after saying he was ok with me taking a wee bit longer, he quickly flip-flopped and turned to my best friend threatening me, through her, about how I was ripping him off. Despite that he had communication with me, and could easily IM me any time and inquire about his commission.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 06:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-12 06:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:Re: I know Ridayah. I know how you feel.
Date: 2007-04-12 11:16 pm (UTC)This is supposed to be a community for discussing actual issues over commissions and other artistic business dealings. I personally think your last statement crosses the line into being scurrilous rather than informative.
As for the art trade thing? It is an artists perogative to refuse trades if they wish. The basis for the decision is their own and I really don't think you should be speaking of past dealings in such a manner since they are do not appear to be really relevant and your entire post seems to be more likely to draw out aggressive commentary and drama than legitimate discussion.
Oh...
Date: 2007-04-12 10:48 pm (UTC)Re: Oh...
Date: 2007-04-12 11:11 pm (UTC)No offence but this is an discussion community which means disagreements happen. Don't tell zyleeth not to look if she doesn't like what is being said, she has just as much right to read and have an opinion about something as anyone else.
Re: Oh...
From:no subject
Date: 2007-04-13 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 07:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-24 05:57 pm (UTC)I actually wrote an essay detailing all of the pitfalls in her argument here, for fun. Its actually rather amusing how poorly she covered her tracks.