Deleted post re-post.

[hamburger.livejournal.com]

(For real this time! I checked! It was indeed deleted.)

Original Poster Name: killmytv

Date of Post: 2011-04-21

Link to Original Post: http://artists-beware.livejournal.com/448801.html

Link to Screengrab of Post: http://i53.tinypic.com/miyn1v.jpg

Tags on Post: advice for artists, fursuit

Also, the edited version of the post naming lordkaosu along with his side of the story.

I will not be adding any beware tags unless one side or another provides some screenshots of the transaction.

ETA: Considering the OP's identity has been confirmed along with their attempt to lie about the situation, I've removed the tag for lordkaosu and added a 'beware' against sweetnightmare.

Comments

[scixzor.livejournal.com]

She did not send it out because she had been burned before. You refused to drop the claim so understandably she would not have sent it out, because the funds were on hold. However, you still got your suit refund, and she offered you a FREE fursuit head, which you denied. A beware would not be warranted in this case. We have all of this documented.

[neolucky.livejournal.com]

You are a not a moderator. Please do not instruct our users as to what would be warranted or not.

Yes. It would be warranted, we would most likely accept a beware like this as it is incredibly valid. 20 day wait on a paid-for product? You bet that's well warranted. You think a refund and offer of a free head somehow negates a 20 day waiting period and bad business ethics?

You've been asked before, compile your own beware and post it here with all this documented evidence you claim to have.

[pikachu25a.livejournal.com]

only reason i was offered the head was so I wouldnt post her on ab, which i think thats bribery