Question about TOS
Feb. 4th, 2014 12:59 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
A customer agrees to a TOS that states "No reviews, negative or positive, can be posted anywhere for any reason"
Customer has a horrible experience.
Can the artist then sue the customer if such a review was ever posted?
Yes, that's a horrible TOS, I have no idea why anyone would ever agree to it, but should the customer just let it go for fear of being sued or is it a baseless threat.
Customer has a horrible experience.
Can the artist then sue the customer if such a review was ever posted?
Yes, that's a horrible TOS, I have no idea why anyone would ever agree to it, but should the customer just let it go for fear of being sued or is it a baseless threat.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-05 12:18 am (UTC)Usually to win in a case of "defamation of character" have pretty hard evidence that shows the customer, without a single doubt, done it personally. Kind of like "Emotional damage" cases- they are hard to win.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-05 05:53 am (UTC)I think proving a review actually lost them business might be tricky(I guess the seller would have to go with: buyer posting negative review = foreseeability of damage to their business?).
I dunno how it would affect them trying to prove a breach, which would likely only get them their suit/time spent drawing the artwork(and that'd need to be priced, there's more fees) back- not damages.
I dunno on this one. *L* The American laws on it in this case are way different from my country! And I would have assumed Free Speech would protect this kind of things, I'm kinda shocked it doesn't.
I live in a common law country where we have both the legal fiction regarding unfair terms and the Unfair Terms Act itself and these tend to consider trying to ban a fair review of a product as an unreasonable term. So the seller could never win trying to enforce it as a breach.
(NDAs, as were mentioned above, are not considered in the same kettle of fish as a review by the direct/end consumer)