[identity profile] roxyfur.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] artists_beware
This is a question to other artists as well as people who commission artwork.

Time and time again, I receive reference sheets that are difficult to read in some way or another. They're either screencaptures from SecondLife, shaded with unclear swatches, or just plain inconsistent. I tend to spend a lot more time on pieces like these, when I have to spend an unusually long time reading a reference sheet.

The question is, would it be fair of me to implement a "difficult reference sheet" charge to make up for the additional time spent on the piece? Clients, would this deter you from commissioning an artist, if they had that kind of fee?

I know there's fees out there for complicated characters, but this is slightly different. I've had characters that ended up being relatively simple, but still spend forever interpreting the reference sheet before seeing their simplicity.

Thanks to any thoughts regarding this topic!

Date: 2014-06-20 08:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] armaina.livejournal.com
Something that also might help in the future, is writing up an article/journal of what a 'clear reference' is to you, and tips that can help your commissioners know the best images to give you, so that you can just quickly link to it if any questions come up.

(I've actually seen some very good SL ref sheets, but that was only because they took photos in very clear lighting and did a full turn around shot against a solid background. Basically, you have to know what you're doing to make it clear.)
Edited Date: 2014-06-20 08:30 pm (UTC)

Date: 2014-06-20 08:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] starcharmer.livejournal.com
A LOT of people don't accept SL refs, so I don't think that would surprise many commissioners.

Date: 2014-06-21 01:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sacch.livejournal.com
I didn't know this. I've gotten so many SL refs that I've turned away commissioners for (and hella complicated characters like whoa) and I'm glad to know I'm not alone in the thought that SL refs aren't the best...

Date: 2014-06-24 07:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] starcharmer.livejournal.com
Oh yeah, tons of people have it in their ToS and will post it in their info when they advertise their commissions and such.

Profile

artists_beware: (Default)
Commissioner & Artist, Warning & Kudos Community

December 2017

S M T W T F S
      12
3456789
10 11 1213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 31st, 2025 03:29 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios