Warning about a bad deal
Aug. 26th, 2008 10:46 pmFewer things get me as riled as people not paying artists what they're worth. I'm writing to alert folks of a specific example of this, simply by giving the details of what the pay rate is. You can make your own decisions for yourselves to work for this individual for these prices, it's of my opinion that any artist who contributes to something like this further encourages the low pay of skilled artists and perpetuates the opinion of non-artists that good art is cheap.
If you are approached by a user named Ken09199 on DeviantArt to draw items for his virtual pet site LuraPets http://www.lurapets.com/, please be aware of the pay rate he quoted me when I asked for more information.
Pay rate for items: $0.50 per completion of each item. Example here:
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i315/maison66/items/lettuce_iceberg.png
Pay rate for NPC's (characters): $5.00
Also, you can get up to $2.00 for items and up to $7.00 for NPC's if the artwork is, to quote, "fantastic". The owner of this site told me that they pay based on the quality of the image. If your art is better, naturally they'll pay more. A dollar more.
I'm aware some people may feel this is a fair deal. It's your choice of course, but realize that items of that quality, for most people, would take about 20 minutes to a half an hour, earning you a pay rate of $1.00 per hour for an item you can't sell elsewhere. Minimum wage in my state is something closer to $8.00 for reference.
I asked if that price was per useage of the item, like if someone buys the item on the site, is the artist entitled to a fraction of the proceeds. The answer is no, this is a one time payment of 50 cents per item drawn.
Here's my official response:
I'm sorry but that is horribly unreasonable. Especially as pay is
completely based on someone's opinion . If my work is as good as you
said it was when you approached me you'd already know that I take my
work very seriously and consider it just that: work. I wouldn't ask
you to do your job for a dollar an hour for something you won't be
able to sell anywhere else, please don't ask the same of me.
Best of luck finding "quality" artists who will find these prices
reasonable but I can assure you, they're hard to find.
I'm of course not here to bash the individual, after all he approached me on his own accord and complimented me on my work, but I felt the need to draw attention to yet another example of why our market is so bad, that these are the prices people expect to pay for quality work.
If you are approached by a user named Ken09199 on DeviantArt to draw items for his virtual pet site LuraPets http://www.lurapets.com/, please be aware of the pay rate he quoted me when I asked for more information.
Pay rate for items: $0.50 per completion of each item. Example here:
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i315/maison66/items/lettuce_iceberg.png
Pay rate for NPC's (characters): $5.00
Also, you can get up to $2.00 for items and up to $7.00 for NPC's if the artwork is, to quote, "fantastic". The owner of this site told me that they pay based on the quality of the image. If your art is better, naturally they'll pay more. A dollar more.
I'm aware some people may feel this is a fair deal. It's your choice of course, but realize that items of that quality, for most people, would take about 20 minutes to a half an hour, earning you a pay rate of $1.00 per hour for an item you can't sell elsewhere. Minimum wage in my state is something closer to $8.00 for reference.
I asked if that price was per useage of the item, like if someone buys the item on the site, is the artist entitled to a fraction of the proceeds. The answer is no, this is a one time payment of 50 cents per item drawn.
Here's my official response:
I'm sorry but that is horribly unreasonable. Especially as pay is
completely based on someone's opinion . If my work is as good as you
said it was when you approached me you'd already know that I take my
work very seriously and consider it just that: work. I wouldn't ask
you to do your job for a dollar an hour for something you won't be
able to sell anywhere else, please don't ask the same of me.
Best of luck finding "quality" artists who will find these prices
reasonable but I can assure you, they're hard to find.
I'm of course not here to bash the individual, after all he approached me on his own accord and complimented me on my work, but I felt the need to draw attention to yet another example of why our market is so bad, that these are the prices people expect to pay for quality work.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 05:43 am (UTC)Nothing surprises me anymore but I sympathize with the situation. :/
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 05:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(stupid question time)
From:Re: (stupid question time)
From:Re: (stupid question time)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 06:10 am (UTC)NOT talking about myself at all here, since I'm not fantastic and don't ever claim to be - but it's a problem I see all the time happening to my peers on FA and other art sites - price wars.
In an ideal world we'd be able to charge by the hour, but realistically people want to see a price list and order art as if they were ordering food off a menu - piece w/ background, sketch, full CG coloured lineart, etc. The fact that each piece takes different amounts of time and effort to complete satisfactorily is something that most people who aren't artists don't really seem to understand - not saying they don't know there's a lot of work involved, it's more of a question of not knowing that there's no 'template' for the work that most artists do, and that you can't pull good poses and anatomy and colouring out of a hat (good referencing practices notwithstanding - a point for another time!). Really, it's a terminology problem - customers want a product when they're really asking for a service that produces a product, and it's the process you pay for.
The real problem comes from the fact there are so many artists around who offer commissions now - and why pay $50 for work from artist A who's charging 'real' prices when artist B does work of a similar quality for $30? People don't charge what they're worth because they can't afford to when people are undercutting significantly all round. The market's now full of customers who don't understand the process or value of the work involved, and so to survive you've got to either lower your prices or just... become much, much better and hope your work attains some sort of 'name brand' status, because no matter how good you are, unless people know about you and talk about you, you ain't going nowhere in the fandom :|
sad. :(
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 07:22 pm (UTC)Lesser known or not, you should not allow yourself to only paid for 50 cents to 7 dollars for a single piece of commercial artwork ESPECIALLY when when there are no royalties.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 08:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 09:08 am (UTC)I myself charge crap change for my commissions because really? I've offered them at higher prices, and got no bites, and I really undervalue my work because frankly, I think I'm terrible.
I know part of my problem is because I'm relatively unknown, and because I'm rather nervous, and come off unsociable and distant.
We really need people to start giving general prices, or perhaps have a forum where we can get Price checks. That way, people like me who are not really sure about the quality of their art, can have those who know more about art, and pricing, give their two cents.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 09:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 10:30 am (UTC)To add insult to injury, this guy obviously wants the commercial rights to the art as well.
Crap on that.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 12:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 11:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 12:14 pm (UTC)hence in my opinion, 13 yr olds sholdn't try to run communial pet sites.
i don't know if there is one here that has something like powerpets or even wajas caliber here.
so i guess 'sorry' to them if they achived it.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 12:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 02:34 pm (UTC)The convo usually goes like this
me: How much will I get paid?
them: paid?
yeaah...
I also echo what a few other people have said about it being difficult to charge for commissions, being in the UK. I was offering conbadges for $30 usd recently but thats only about £10 gbp by the time paypal fees and shipping comes off. Which is really, nothing, everything here is so expensive. But I enjoyed doing them so I don't mind too much. But I spent about 10 hours on each of them... so, if I was to pay myself minimum wage, I should charge at least £50 (£5 per hour, min wage is actually 5.52..), but no one's going to spend $100 usd on a con badge!
examples if anyone's curious:
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/1496116/
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/1476758/
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 05:22 pm (UTC)hey
Date: 2008-09-01 07:14 pm (UTC)Ken
Re: hey
From:Re: hey
From:Re: hey
From:Re: hey
From:Re: hey
From:Re: hey
From:Re: hey
From:hey :P
Date: 2008-09-01 07:14 pm (UTC)Ken
Re: hey :P
Date: 2008-09-01 07:16 pm (UTC)Re: hey :P
From:Re: hey :P
From:Re: hey :P
From:Re: hey :P
From:Re: hey :P
From:Re: hey :P
From:Re: hey :P
From:Re: hey :P
From:Re: hey :P
From:Re: hey :P
From:Re: hey :P
From:Re: hey :P
From:Re: hey :P
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 07:16 pm (UTC)Items - 1.00usd - 80x80 image
NPCs - 7-15.00USD - 250x250 image :)
Ken
no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 07:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 10:28 pm (UTC)Those prices are beyond insulting.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-03 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 02:12 am (UTC)$0.50-3 pet item drawn depending on artist
$5-15 per NPC/pet drawn depending on artist
$20-40 per map drawn depending on artist
Those are the rates set in the virtual pet market, and everyone who works in that industry is perfectly content with those prices....art wise. I can't say the same for coders since I'm not one. A lot of the time however, most virtual pet artists work for free. Of course the artists that tend to frequent areas like that are young or just starting out with their drawing.
I work for Lurapets and I work under Ken as Art Director. The rates I'm getting are fair to me since that's what I usually charge when it comes to vitual pets images. It's not for everyone, like I said, most artists are usually still in middle school to high school.
Also, the artists we have, 20+ currently, are content with what they are getting and so far, I haven't heard much complaining....well besides this post, but that's about it.
Just my two cents.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-21 10:14 am (UTC)I do think that some of Ken's business practices seem a little sketchy, in the way he recruits artists, and how there's so many when he has so little money.
As far as pay for the artists goes, however, I think it's fair depending on the artist. I'd be pretty happy to get $5 for drawing an animal. I think the pay should increase as the site's success increases, and hopefully it'll happen some day.
......Mmm but maybe I only think all of this because I'm a teenager?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 02:23 am (UTC)It wasn't the pay that was bothering me, it was other things.
But this is a norm in the petsite world guys. Look around a bit more - if this appalled you, you'll be shocked at was else goes on.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 02:35 am (UTC)durp
no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 08:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-02 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-05 09:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-18 05:46 am (UTC)And my rates have increased thanks :)
no subject
Date: 2008-09-23 02:44 am (UTC)Either raise your prices to some acceptable amount and get those "really good" artists you are hunting for, or stick with the crew you have now and stop coming back here to try to make yourself sound fair to people that will NEVER see you that way.
D:
Date: 2008-09-22 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-13 05:23 pm (UTC)NO IT ISN'T.
People, you're selling intellectual property, here! Not only should you be getting royalties, but you're seriously overcharging! These petsites obviously are taking advantage of kids and furries if your so-called "average pay" is correct! Imagine if Disney had given Chris Sanders $30 to hand over Stitch.