Another rule reminder
Jul. 4th, 2011 02:41 pm2. Whatever happens in the community, stays within the community. Do not go to the offender's LJ or art site account and harass them, or contact them any other way if the matter under discussion does not regard you personally.
I noticed several people from the comm in Handehog's journals. Please don't do that. Do not egg him on, try to correct him, or just feed into his whole deal. Not only is it against the rules, but it is not helpful to the situation reported here.
I noticed several people from the comm in Handehog's journals. Please don't do that. Do not egg him on, try to correct him, or just feed into his whole deal. Not only is it against the rules, but it is not helpful to the situation reported here.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-04 06:43 pm (UTC)If the person is one of those fragile types, they may DFE(Delete F*cking Everything) and disappear.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-05 04:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-05 05:30 pm (UTC)This is exactly why people need to use some common sense. There's a different when sending a friendly message to someone vs being a complete drama queen.
The mods should start banning people, we all know the rules.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-05 05:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-07-04 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-04 06:54 pm (UTC)Now he knows about the LJ post and could just delete everything, making him look 'innocent'.
This A_B post sure has gotten people in a frenzy.
Sure, the guy was really rude and out of place, but i've seen much worse posted here.
Just block him from your page then move on. No need to fight a battle you're not a part of.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-04 07:16 pm (UTC)Not saying I agreed with what the guy did, but I thought the swarm of hate was a bit much, especially when I replaced the guy's name with "someone everyone likes"... it sure would have generated a different sort of frenzy altogether.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-04 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-04 08:04 pm (UTC)I'm actually more surprised at how many artists DON'T take payment up front..
I've done that method since I first started taking commissions. It's really common sense so you don't get screwed out of a payment.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-07-04 08:14 pm (UTC)I've seen popular people do horrible things and while no one disagrees that it isn't shitty of them you certainly don't see the frenzy of name-calling and utter hate that guy degenerated. Instead, you see a lot of "benefit of the doubt" and "maybe she's going through some hardships" and "wow, I've never seen this from her" and "maybe you spoke to her wrongly" and "wow, sadly I will have to put her on my black list even though I hate to do it" etc. type replies. And it never falls into 2+ pages of "wow that guy is (insert bad word of choice here)" as about half the replies to that guy's post are. Maybe a page, that's it, cause you can assume a ton of folks who still support the popular artist are remaining quiet about it.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-07-04 08:04 pm (UTC)The A_B article is starting to look like it belongs more in a drama community then based in an informative one. While his actions are truly "disturbing" and his attitude is evil.. we still want to walk the higher ground.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-04 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-04 10:04 pm (UTC)Precisely my thoughts as well.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-08 02:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-04 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-04 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-04 11:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-05 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-05 09:28 pm (UTC)I don't think it's necessarily that people from A_B are going over to him and harassing him; I think word's broken free from LJ and other people around the net are not happy with him, so even if someone's a member of this community they may not have seen the post here (I know I'm not the only one that doesn't keep communities on their friends list, I only check them out periodically) before interacting with him.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-06 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-05 07:39 am (UTC)I'm tired and I'm feeling like this is not coming out right but basically: I don't think people going over to an AB subjects page and discussing what they have written/posted should be against the rules. Whereas I completely agree with the rule about going over there and starting AB post-related flame wars and harassment.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-06 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-06 11:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-07 03:31 pm (UTC)I think it's crazy to state that "once you know it's on A_B then you can't post." That's *really* extreme and not at all the same thing as the rules as written (which I TOTALLY AGREE WITH). I think you guys are really stepping out of your jurisdiction with a clarification that includes responding to publicly posted journals with no proof they were even linked from A_B...if we had a run-in with LJ-Abuse already, fine, but this community has been around and active for years and is yet to have a major issue.
I'm not saying I won't follow the rule, (I wasn't, nor have I ever been one to harass someone on their journals from A_B or elsewhere) but it leaves a very bad taste in my mouth. I can see it used case-by-case (as in the Handehog post) but as a blanket rule it's extremely difficult to enforce and not very clear at all =/.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-07-08 02:37 am (UTC)What worries me is that A_B could get shut down that way, anyhow. If it blows up into enough of a big deal, no amount of restraint on our part would protect us short of our saying "it's not us".