I wasn't going to do more overlays without a new development, and I think Kee listing her references counts as a new development.
Here is example 6, again, now with Acorn's picture, kee's picture, and the photo kee gave as her reference:
Example 6, part III (http://www.spiffyspace.com/misc/example6acorn3.gif)
As you can see, the photo kee gave fits the same areas Acorn had claimed were traced from hers, only better. In fact there's an angle on the thigh (right under the hand in Kee's picture) that is in the photo as well as Kee's piece. THIS actually does make me wonder if the picture was traced from the photo as the evidence is much stronger than any of Acorn's examples (as celarania would say, now there are 3 points that line up perfectly) BUT it could just be a coincidence again, since in this case artist was already following the photo as a ref. Perhaps they just happened to put in three lines very accurately.
I think the claim that Kee traced the thigh on Acorn's work, then later found a photo that fit her piece better is a bit preposterous, and essentially invalidates Acorn's claim that her examples are so close it couldn't be accidental. (because then you shouldn't be able to do it with another, unrelated piece)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Once more
Date: 2011-11-28 12:48 am (UTC)Here is example 6, again, now with Acorn's picture, kee's picture, and the photo kee gave as her reference:
Example 6, part III (http://www.spiffyspace.com/misc/example6acorn3.gif)
As you can see, the photo kee gave fits the same areas Acorn had claimed were traced from hers, only better. In fact there's an angle on the thigh (right under the hand in Kee's picture) that is in the photo as well as Kee's piece.
THIS actually does make me wonder if the picture was traced from the photo as the evidence is much stronger than any of Acorn's examples (as
I think the claim that Kee traced the thigh on Acorn's work, then later found a photo that fit her piece better is a bit preposterous, and essentially invalidates Acorn's claim that her examples are so close it couldn't be accidental. (because then you shouldn't be able to do it with another, unrelated piece)