'LJ-Cut this' comments.
Jul. 3rd, 2010 06:38 pmHey guys,
Just to let you know, you do not have to comment to very lengthy entries with requests for the OP to apply an LJ-cut. If we end up approving a very lengthy or image heavy post, we are already one step ahead of you! We are sending the OP LJ-notes and supplying a comment in the post ourselves about it, often with instructions on how to apply said LJ-cut.
We appreciate each of you attempting to help, but one request and set of instructions is all that there needs to be. This keeps the posts on-track and orderly.
Thank you.
Just to let you know, you do not have to comment to very lengthy entries with requests for the OP to apply an LJ-cut. If we end up approving a very lengthy or image heavy post, we are already one step ahead of you! We are sending the OP LJ-notes and supplying a comment in the post ourselves about it, often with instructions on how to apply said LJ-cut.
We appreciate each of you attempting to help, but one request and set of instructions is all that there needs to be. This keeps the posts on-track and orderly.
Thank you.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 02:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 02:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 02:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 04:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 05:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 05:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 05:52 am (UTC)Another problem with that is, sometimes an LJ-cut looks like it's done properly in the moderation queue, and we only find out it's broken when it's approved. The rich text editor messes things up that we can't really see beforehand.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 05:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 05:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 05:54 am (UTC)People don't seem to be into a habit of reading community rules on LJ in general, it's not just us. I wish I knew of a good way to fix that.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 06:00 am (UTC)It wouldn't hurt.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 06:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 07:19 am (UTC)And then at least you can always say "HAY IT WAS IN THE RULES!" XD
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 06:02 am (UTC)This has helped to a degree, in my opinion believe it or not. But until LJ can allow comms to throw the rules into awaiting member's faces, we'll just have to keep doing things the hard way.