[identity profile] kayla-la.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] artists_beware
I've edited the form with some of people's suggestions, so feel free to refresh it and take a look!

We have a lot of threads about TOSes and the like, but I'm here to ask for critique and help with my commission form.

I built it a while back, but I rarely take commissions, so I only had the opportunity to actually try using it recently. The commissioners seemed overwhelmed by all the information I was asking for, even though it's all things I would need to know and would usually have to chase them down for a few days to gather via email.

But if I can help it, I don't want to intimidate my commissioners, so I'd like to see if anyone has any suggestions. And I figured anyone else who has a commission form can throw theirs into the comments if they want critique. Should be a handy thread for anyone thinking of building a form, as well.

Anyway, my form is here: http://fs12.formsite.com/Kayla-La/form470441986/index.html

I eventually intend to add a link to my TOS once I've rewritten it, as well as replace the image at the top with a custom one assuming formsite'll let me. Otherwise, have at it!

Date: 2010-08-28 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pariahsdream.livejournal.com
Firstly, TOS is a misnomer for what you have here. These aren't your Terms, this is an order form. I'll show you mine- http://pariahsdream.ladyvulcan.com/cof.html

Always remember KISS- keep it simple stupid. Instead of listing every possible variation, you could take it and make your choices the most popular you receive and then add another box for 'inquiries' or specials. Also, I would not let both refs AND a description of the char be optional. If they don't have refs, they can email and tell you.

Date: 2010-08-28 06:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pariahsdream.livejournal.com
Never mind, I misread what you meant about TOS's, strike that part.

Date: 2010-08-28 06:29 pm (UTC)
ocelotish: A girl with an ocelot on her shoulders (Default)
From: [personal profile] ocelotish
Oddly enough, I'd get rid of some of the optional stuff; I think that gets a little overwhelming. Just make accessories, scope of picture, media, and description mandatory (they can always say no accessories and I'd think you'd always want some personality). Then I might condense extra info for both the character and the commission into one field. I know that you're trying to give them more freedom, but I think it actually may result in confusion. If you say something is optional it adds another decision of "Do I need to fill this out?" on top of adding the information. I know it sounds silly, but try going through it yourself and fill it out for your character and you'll see what I mean.

Date: 2010-08-28 06:48 pm (UTC)
ocelotish: A girl with an ocelot on her shoulders (Default)
From: [personal profile] ocelotish
Actually what I mean is just remove the "Optional" note from those fields. If people don't have that they can just write in "none." What I was getting at is that it essentially makes them think, "Do I have accessories?" followed by "What accessories do I have?" instead of only "What accessories do I have?" It's kind of a stupid distinction, but when you have of optional questions that first "Do I have blank?" adds another step of thinking each time. If you go through and count each optional as a question, it adds 12 questions onto your form!

Now obviously, I'm not saying that you shouldn't have any optional questions, but make sure they're really something that's a bit outside the norm or has some sort of consequence (like the deadline question).

Also, do you want to change the deadline phrasing to "Deadline (optional, may incur extra charge)" or something like that? Otherwise it looks like it they want it by any solid time, even 6 months or a year from now, there might be another charge.

Date: 2010-08-28 07:25 pm (UTC)
ocelotish: A girl with an ocelot on her shoulders (Default)
From: [personal profile] ocelotish
Fair enough, and that may be something you discuss in your TOS, but they're obviously not there yet! ^^;

I think it looks better already. :) I'd still recommend removing the "optional" text from a couple of them to streamline it, but it's your choice.

Date: 2010-08-28 06:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shiftergoddess.livejournal.com
I, personaly, won't accept commissions without a highly detailed description or a reference sheet simply for the fact i've seen WAY too many commissioner complaints because THEY didn't submit enough info to the artist. I just eliminate that problem before it starts.
But again, commission work is my hobby and i take them when i want to, not as a source of income, so i can be uber picky with what i accept.

I would say that if they don't provide enough information to you the first time around to just reply to their e-mail stating what you need and if they don't give you the right amount of info you need, pass them up and go on to the next commissioner.
I believe it was someone in this comm. not long ago that said if the commissioner doesn't have enough respect to give you all the details you need to provide a service for them, they don't respect your business.

Date: 2010-08-28 06:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shiftergoddess.livejournal.com
Er huurr stupid me, forgot to add...
For the form, i just keep it simple and have the important fields 100% necessary to complete the work. Like species, gender, ect. But again the reference sheet eliminates a lot of the guess work for the character.
Things like background type, pose (optional) and such can be lumped together as extra options in one field.

Date: 2010-08-28 06:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shiftergoddess.livejournal.com
Ah yeah, i see how that would be an issue. But you could always make it required to have one detailed character reference for the form. That way you have them submit the best image they have of their character and they don't give you the "here's my character gallery, find a good one" kind of thing.

Date: 2010-08-28 06:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xylophagous.livejournal.com
Honestly I can't figure out what might seem like too much here, almost all the fields are optional other than things that are one word answers (Species, Eye Color, Gender). It may honestly just be the fact that there's a form involved but honestly if someone had a decent ref sheet and just linked that and filled out just the required info it would only take maybe 5min (this includes going and fetching links/info).
So I have no idea what to tell you as far as how to make it less "overwhelming".

Date: 2010-08-28 06:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sigilgoat.livejournal.com
I'd agree that it's just overly complex.

I don't think there's a need for the email twice. If they got it wrong, that's their mistake and they need to contact you at your contact email. You don't need a field for eye color, they should have that in the general description, just extra stuff like that

I don't think my form is in any way perfect, but it does work pretty well: http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dDhmMWJyMXQ3RHV1RVE0RndJelBYc2c6MA

I occasionally will send out an email for clarification, but more often than not, everything is there that I need.

Date: 2010-08-28 07:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ichigoneko33.livejournal.com
My old form has a place to put their username and a place for their email. That might help with misspelling.

Date: 2010-08-28 07:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ichigoneko33.livejournal.com
you could also say, username on which site?

Date: 2010-08-28 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grandioze.livejournal.com
I don't really see a problem with it TBH. Most websites require you to do the same thing when you sign up for an account.

Date: 2010-08-28 07:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grandioze.livejournal.com
Thanks! Yeah, birds are awesome.
I'd have more bird icons if it didn't cost money. XD



Date: 2010-08-28 07:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sigilgoat.livejournal.com
that does look better! 8D I like it c:

Date: 2010-08-28 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sigilgoat.livejournal.com
no, i just have to look at the spreadsheet once a day, I dont even know how to get it to email me that someone did it XD

Date: 2010-08-28 08:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sigilgoat.livejournal.com
Yes, I gotta remind myself to check it every morning ;__;

luckily the people who use it usually send me an email letting me know they did it

Date: 2010-08-28 08:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pariahsdream.livejournal.com
Not to butt in- but I'm using a google-theme myself and ran into the same problem. What I've discovered is you may have to host it offsite. That's what worked for me anyways.

Date: 2010-08-28 08:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pariahsdream.livejournal.com
Do you have your own space on the web? You would need to take the info that the google theme gives you (after you edit it to your needs) and upload it to your server.

Date: 2010-08-28 11:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pariahsdream.livejournal.com
When you're putting the info in the google temple, I believe it automatically sends to your gmail account. At least that's what I remember, it's been a little while since I created mine. I do know I get an update to my gmail whenever my spreadsheet gets updated/I get a new client.

Date: 2010-08-29 02:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrfurfag.livejournal.com
SHUT THE FUCK UP

Date: 2010-08-29 11:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] teahound.livejournal.com
And this is why you were denied membership to FD_2.

Date: 2010-08-29 03:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] onesteptwo.livejournal.com
As far as your form goes, it seems completely reasonable to me. I even showed it to my not-in-the-fandom boyfriend who said he didn't see the problem and that most of it was optional anyway, so what's the big deal?

Date: 2010-08-29 04:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] onesteptwo.livejournal.com
Don't make it too easy. ;) You'll encourage the stupid.

Date: 2010-08-29 04:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] onesteptwo.livejournal.com
It's the furry fandom. OF COURSE they want porn.

Date: 2010-08-29 05:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uozlulu.livejournal.com
I wouldn't call it a TOS, but it's a good comission submission form.

What I would add to it (if this is possible on the template) is a TOS and a little check box that says "I have read and agree to the TOS" so that youc an prove that this person did read your TOS so they can't play "But I didn't know" if something were to come up. If you can't add a check box, you could always put a drop down at the end

But you'd need to formulate a TOS before you could add it to the submission form. like Type of Commission and have Yes and No as the options to the answer "Have you read the TOS [link]?"

Date: 2010-08-30 07:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frazzled-niya.livejournal.com
I think because TOS stands out in your post o_O;...

I don't see anything wrong with your submission form, but that's me, I do agree with don't make it too easy comment that [livejournal.com profile] onesteptwo

And yeah adding a link to your ToS would be good too :)

Date: 2010-08-30 09:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] frazzled-niya.livejournal.com
hehe you get that :)

Profile

artists_beware: (Default)
Commissioner & Artist, Warning & Kudos Community

December 2017

S M T W T F S
      12
3456789
10 11 1213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 25th, 2026 03:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios