[identity profile] makealittlewish.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] artists_beware
 Hey guys. I probably really shouldn't be complaining as I still have a few commissions due myself, but I need insight on if I should pursue this issue.

I commissioned an artist who happens to go to my school at FWA this year. I pretty much knew them, and as a fellow student, I figured there was no rhyme or reason to not commission them. I loved their work and I figured they would be perfect to draw a really creepy image of my typically cutesy chupacabra.

I paid them (on Saturday), saw them working on it while I worked on commissions myself, and was told it would be completed the next day (Sunday). The next day it still wasn't done, but that didn't bother me since we go to the same school, and I figured I could see them in the dining hall the following Monday and nab my commission there. Well.. no dice.

After FWA, I never saw them around the school. I am great friends with their roommate. The roommate told me that they wouldn't give out a phone number, but that they would talk to the artist for me and try to work something out. I sent messages to the artist many times through the roommate, mainly because I had absolutely no other way of contacting them. I was told by the roommate that the artist is not a furry and thus would not have an FA. I am unaware of any other online accounts as well. Every time I saw my friend since FWA, I had requested he grab the commission for me since the artist could not be bothered to work with me. The friend told me to try to catch the artist right after a class, which I could not do as I had a meeting. This Monday, the artist gave me a phone call but I had a class so it went to voicemail. I quickly shot them a text message explaining that I got out at "x" time. I got a break shortly after, called them, but received no answer. We played phone tag a few more times, but eventually they never called me back. I couldn't leave a voice message because their inbox isn't set up.

After days of receiving no more contact from the artist, they finally turned over the commission to my friend to give to me upon my request. I was really excited and as I examined the drawing I realized that it was a photocopy. Not only was it that, but it had photocopy dots all over the white of the paper and some of the lines were pixellated. I was not happy that I did not receive the original as I expected (and saw others given at FWA). My friend tried to guess as to why, such as the artist didn't want to rip it out of the sketchbook or wanted to keep the original for a portfolio. But this still made me agitated.

I have recently sent them a few texts asking for the original scans and edits or the original. I REALLY want the original, as I feel that I paid for a drawing - not a photocopy. I realize that the communication issue is my fault for thinking I'd be able to just see them in person, as well as for thinking I'd get the actual artwork. The original was not exactly agreed upon.. but usually at cons you are just given the piece of art and that's that, right?

I am very dissatisfied with what I have received and do not feel like I got what I paid for. The drawing is FANTASTIC. The copy I have of it? Not so much. It is regular printer paper and is speckled as if it were xeroxed. Should I continue to contact this artist demanding my original, or let it go? If the artist refuses communication for a while longer, should I post a beware?

Any opinions are appreciated. Thank you.

EDIT (5/8): I have told the artist that if they continue to refuse contact with me that I will post a beware about them tomorrow morning, as there is no reason they should ignore an unsatisfied customer. However, if the artist DOES get in contact with me, I know many of you want their name for your personal records. Please note me if you want their link.

Date: 2011-05-08 03:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neolucky.livejournal.com
Woaaah...after all that, you get a -photocopy-? Holy crap. No, I'd post the beware at this point. It sounds like you've honestly tried to contact them, and you've seen them working on it and KNOW they have the original.

Well...I hope they would. I'm wondering if something happened to the original and they were just too embarrassed to tell you? either way, I would let them know you're thinking of posting them up more openly here and that you want the original or a refund. A photocopy doesn't cut it.

Commissions

Date: 2011-05-08 04:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brokenclockwork.livejournal.com
Gosh... y'know, as an artist I really feel that you've been wronged.

Granted, yeah, maybe the communication issue was at fault on both sides. But when you commission someone to do a piece for you you SHOULD get the finished product. If there's some reason why you can't get it, like they feel it will strengthen their portfolio, they might want to refund the money because, clearly, they ended up doing it for THEM not for you. And you're not paying them to strengthen their portfolio or fill their sketchbook.

That being said, if you are a much nicer person the artist should at the very least supply you with high res digital copies, such as scans. But for that matter the artist really ought to keep that for their portfolio explaining that it was a hired job and the original went to the client. (An employer would understand.)

I wish you the best of luck resolving it.

Date: 2011-05-08 05:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skulldog.livejournal.com
Honestly, as someone that does cons, and occasionally ends up taking home work after the con, sending a printed copy is pretty much a big no in my book. There's really no reason they should be sending a very poor copy in place of the original, if they where in contact and gave a reason they might temporarily need the original for something, I can understand. But, there's no reason they can't hand off the original to the third party here in this case.

Keep on contacting them, and maybe toss a name for us here, so we can avoid the same issues.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] skiota.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-08 06:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-05-08 05:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alcyione.livejournal.com
Wow, no. That is a HUGE, huge NO. I wouldn't even DREAM of giving a paying customer JUST a photocopy. That's awful. D:

Date: 2011-05-08 05:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] silvertales.livejournal.com
As a commissionable artist, who occasionally has to take work home to be completed in the days after conventions, this is UNacceptable. Unless it was clearly communicated ahead of time that the original wasn't necessary (believe it or not I've actually had clients who have generously suggested I keep the original either for my portfolio or sale, depending on the project, as all they wanted was digital press-ready files) then you PAID for an original.

If they felt the drawing was strong enough to place in their portfolio... well, great, but they don't get to keep it after the fact. In that case, they're welcome (with your permission) to make a high-quality print/scan for portfolio use only with the explanation that the piece was work-for-hire) and deliver the original to you...or refund your money, but even that should have been discussed WITH YOU.

Situations like this are why contracts, or at the very least a list of terms and conditions and good communication, are so very important. That way, everyone is on the same page and it protects both the artist and the commissioner.

Keep contacting them, you PAID for an original, and that's what you should have gotten.

Date: 2011-05-08 06:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spiffystuff.livejournal.com
I agree but FWIW my understanding is that while asking permission would be courteous, artist doesn't need permission to make a copy unless they signed away their rights (which usually isn't the case)

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] ocelotish - Date: 2011-05-08 07:27 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-05-08 05:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilenth.livejournal.com

A photocopy? Really? Wow, that's just, wow. How long does it take to copy an image if you want to keep the original? Seriously?

Even in situations where the physical copy is not included, the client should really get a high res digital version, and perhaps a high res print if applicable, not a photocopy which is a poor reproduction method as best. So even if they're not going to give you the original (to be fair, you should have had it clarified that you wanted the original piece) they still should give you a decent copy of the piece you hired them to make.

How much did you pay? Do you have proof of payment? If you have evidence of what you paid for? I'd suggest making it clear to the artist that if you do not receive an adequate copy of the work, you will pursue legal channels, that may result in them contacting you and sorting this matter out. If not, your only option may be to continue to ask for a proper copy/the original as well as to make a full beware about him including his name here.

I suggest in future that you get your commissions agreements in hardcopy describing what you're paying for, and with a receipt so you have plenty of option for dealing with unprofessional artists.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] lilenth.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-08 10:03 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-05-08 07:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lobotomysoup.livejournal.com
FWA as in Furry Weekend Atlanta?

How did they know about the furry con if they're not connected to anything furry?
Thats kinda risky if they've no connection at all but doing business there. :c
Did they at least have cards or something with email addresses?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] kayla-la.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-08 03:02 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-05-08 07:17 am (UTC)
ocelotish: A girl with an ocelot on her shoulders (Default)
From: [personal profile] ocelotish
Even if they want it for a portfolio you always use copies for portfolios. Everyone asks for prints, and specifically don't want originals (so they won't be responsible for them). So I just wanted to say that isn't a valid excuse.

Date: 2011-05-08 08:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thaily.livejournal.com
Yes, portfolios is a thing you send to companies you'd like to work for and only contains copies because 9 out of 10 times you never get it back.

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] ocelotish - Date: 2011-05-08 03:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thaily.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-08 04:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] ocelotish - Date: 2011-05-08 03:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-05-08 08:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thaily.livejournal.com
Unless agreed upon, you don't necessarily get the original.
That said, if everyone else was getting them and the artist doesn't care to at least explain why you're only getting a photocopy (and not even a scan, wtf?) yeah I'd keep at it a while longer and post a beware if the artists stays incommunicado.

Date: 2011-05-08 08:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thaily.livejournal.com
Additionally, I'm the type of person who never tears anything out of their sketchbook. But it doesn't take much to scan the drawing, make a cheap print and trace it on to clean paper. Finish. Ship. Not rocket science.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] holydust.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-08 01:15 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-05-08 03:27 pm (UTC)
ocelotish: A girl with an ocelot on her shoulders (Default)
From: [personal profile] ocelotish
I would disagree with this. At cons, the standard is the actual piece (with the exception of digital art or whatever), and that the original is generally the point (like in a portrait painting).

In addition, if there agreement had been only a print there would have to be more discussion of that other than "here's a low res photocopy." Generally speaking the client would have options of more than one copy, size, paper quality, etc. even if at a higher cost.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thaily.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-08 04:05 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] ocelotish - Date: 2011-05-08 04:25 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thaily.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-08 05:13 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] ocelotish - Date: 2011-05-08 06:13 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thaily.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-08 07:37 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] ocelotish - Date: 2011-05-08 08:18 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thaily.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-08 11:19 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] ocelotish - Date: 2011-05-08 11:43 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thaily.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-08 11:49 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] ocelotish - Date: 2011-05-09 12:02 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thaily.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-08 07:43 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-05-08 04:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ciderfox.livejournal.com
I'm mortified that an art student would do this, of all people. It's standard for professional artists to keep originals (as far as I've been told by my professors who work as illustrators) but they would never just send their client a really crappy copy of the thing o__o
However, since they were giving everyone else the original, you definitely have the right to receive it in my opinion.

Every artist should use a contract, but unfortunately they don't. (Myself included, the TOS is taking ages to write lol).

Date: 2011-05-08 04:27 pm (UTC)
ocelotish: A girl with an ocelot on her shoulders (Default)
From: [personal profile] ocelotish
It's standard for the artist to keep the original and sell the right to companies, but if the illustrator was doing a portrait, drawing of a pet, etc., the standard is definitely sell the original, keep the rights. It all depends on what the client is using it for - display/personal use or reproduction.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ciderfox.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-08 06:27 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] ocelotish - Date: 2011-05-08 06:39 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thaily.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-08 07:48 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] kriscynical.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-09 03:02 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] kriscynical.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-05-09 04:11 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-05-15 10:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peas-n-rice.livejournal.com
Sort of related... I traded originals with someone and they mailed me photocopies too.... I sent them the original works, I got photocopies. I mentioned it was a photocopy...and they sent me another photocopy?
I'm pretty upset too, so if you get an answer pass it along, neh?

Profile

artists_beware: (Default)
Commissioner & Artist, Warning & Kudos Community

December 2017

S M T W T F S
      12
3456789
10 11 1213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 05:07 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios