WhiteFenrril and admitted art theft
Oct. 24th, 2011 08:15 pmThe user WhiteFenrril on Furaffinity admitted to me over instant messenger that he traces his artwork.
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/whitefenrril
He contacted me and after I looked at his gallery a lot of the images in his gallery looked traced, so I called him out and this is the admission that I received: http://i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae330/FruityBlergs/stolenartadmissioncensored.png
Most of the commissions in his gallery are TRACED. DO NOT COMMISSION HIM. If you have commissioned this artist in the past please ask for your money back!
I would also appreciate it if the people on this community could help me find the sources of his traced images!
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/whitefenrril
He contacted me and after I looked at his gallery a lot of the images in his gallery looked traced, so I called him out and this is the admission that I received: http://i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae330/FruityBlergs/stolenartadmissioncensored.png
Most of the commissions in his gallery are TRACED. DO NOT COMMISSION HIM. If you have commissioned this artist in the past please ask for your money back!
I would also appreciate it if the people on this community could help me find the sources of his traced images!
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:46 am (UTC)For all you know, they took bits and pieces of anatomy together in photoshop, turned the opacity way down, and traced over a cobbled-together image to create their tracing. There isn't any evidence that they are actually stealing, and I think the way that you spoke to them, calling their work "shit" (no matter how low or high quality quality you think it is) in the screencap you posted is just plain rude.
Personally if they can't be proven to have stolen anything, I don't see why people shouldn't commission them if they feel inclined. Sure there are plenty of other artists on FA who may be better or worse, but people can make their own choices.
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:53 am (UTC)There's a way to reference photos that doesn't involve directly tracing photos.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:53 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:56 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:58 am (UTC)Sorry but I think someone tracing photographs is still tracing and getting paid to do so, and that is still conning people out of money when they expected an original image.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:59 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:12 am (UTC)Without overlays it just sounds kind of grudge-posty.
EDIT:
WHELP I stand corrected
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:18 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:20 am (UTC)Edit: Looks like it's traced from porn, which is not ok nor free to use. This is the exact situation I asked for a refund when I found out an artist was tracing her work.
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:25 am (UTC)Professional artists use stock all the time for reference purposes, but there's a difference between referencing and straight-up copying.
Even if it's free to use, I'm also in the boat of people would would rather not commission someone who's tracing.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:32 am (UTC)http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6347137
the foreshortening gives it away
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:35 am (UTC)It just doesn't look right.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:40 am (UTC)(Links are NSFW)
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/2493464/
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3590820/
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:42 am (UTC)their style varies far too much from pic to pic
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:04 am (UTC)This itself is not proof of tracing, but highly referenced I think is pretty clear.
The other thing that makes me kinda weary is how he can make a very nicely detailed picture one moment, and then one that isnt as high of quality the next.
Its not enough to make me point out Thief, but it does cause me to want to tread lightly when dealing with such a person.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:15 am (UTC)It's more so the fact a lot of it looked really traced because of coloring, foreshortening, and blah blah blah and the ones that looked like that were being paid for by people and I don't like people stealing money.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:34 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 05:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 08:01 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 09:25 am (UTC)I know you specified stock further down, but come on. Not only is that a great way for the person to completely stunt themselves, but it's unethical, dishonest, and LAZY. How much talent does it take to trace a photograph vs. draw something on your own?
For all you know, they took bits and pieces of anatomy together in photoshop, turned the opacity way down, and traced over a cobbled-together image to create their tracing.
Lazy. Unethical. Cheater. They need to pick up an anatomy book and actually learn something. I'd be pissed as hell if I commissioned someone and found out they threw together crap like that and charged me for it.
I hesitate to call people like that artists. If they'd done that at the college I went to, they would have been expelled immediately.
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 09:31 am (UTC)