WhiteFenrril and admitted art theft
Oct. 24th, 2011 08:15 pmThe user WhiteFenrril on Furaffinity admitted to me over instant messenger that he traces his artwork.
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/whitefenrril
He contacted me and after I looked at his gallery a lot of the images in his gallery looked traced, so I called him out and this is the admission that I received: http://i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae330/FruityBlergs/stolenartadmissioncensored.png
Most of the commissions in his gallery are TRACED. DO NOT COMMISSION HIM. If you have commissioned this artist in the past please ask for your money back!
I would also appreciate it if the people on this community could help me find the sources of his traced images!
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/whitefenrril
He contacted me and after I looked at his gallery a lot of the images in his gallery looked traced, so I called him out and this is the admission that I received: http://i984.photobucket.com/albums/ae330/FruityBlergs/stolenartadmissioncensored.png
Most of the commissions in his gallery are TRACED. DO NOT COMMISSION HIM. If you have commissioned this artist in the past please ask for your money back!
I would also appreciate it if the people on this community could help me find the sources of his traced images!
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:46 am (UTC)For all you know, they took bits and pieces of anatomy together in photoshop, turned the opacity way down, and traced over a cobbled-together image to create their tracing. There isn't any evidence that they are actually stealing, and I think the way that you spoke to them, calling their work "shit" (no matter how low or high quality quality you think it is) in the screencap you posted is just plain rude.
Personally if they can't be proven to have stolen anything, I don't see why people shouldn't commission them if they feel inclined. Sure there are plenty of other artists on FA who may be better or worse, but people can make their own choices.
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:53 am (UTC)There's a way to reference photos that doesn't involve directly tracing photos.
(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:58 am (UTC)Sorry but I think someone tracing photographs is still tracing and getting paid to do so, and that is still conning people out of money when they expected an original image.
(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:00 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:43 am (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 09:25 am (UTC)I know you specified stock further down, but come on. Not only is that a great way for the person to completely stunt themselves, but it's unethical, dishonest, and LAZY. How much talent does it take to trace a photograph vs. draw something on your own?
For all you know, they took bits and pieces of anatomy together in photoshop, turned the opacity way down, and traced over a cobbled-together image to create their tracing.
Lazy. Unethical. Cheater. They need to pick up an anatomy book and actually learn something. I'd be pissed as hell if I commissioned someone and found out they threw together crap like that and charged me for it.
I hesitate to call people like that artists. If they'd done that at the college I went to, they would have been expelled immediately.
(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 09:37 am (UTC)Please stop spreading misinformation.
Tracing photos, even if you alter the image, is derivative work and copyright infringement.
Add to that the fact that the customers don't know he's tracing and most probably don't want to pay for something a kindergartener could do and land them in hot water if they found out.
(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:02 pm (UTC)(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 08:08 pm (UTC)This is wrong on a number of accounts. Professionals (at least on conceptart.org) are fine with tracing ethically, meaning if and only if the original image may be used legally. So if you get it from a free stock site, or pay the proper royalties you're good to go, but you can't just use straight google images.
Tracing is something that's really looked down upon by many amateur artists as a shortcut, but is appreciated by professionals for the same reason. Personally I don't have a problem with it because I don't see it as very different than heavy referencing just with a big time-saver. It's a tool, but just like any other tool available to an artist, it can be abused and that's where you get the "traced look" and camera distorted proportions.
For those of you who are inevitably going to say you could do the piece just as well yourself, do you really think you could make a Drew Struzan poster if you had the photos he traced?
(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) no subject
Date: 2011-10-26 09:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 02:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:32 am (UTC)http://www.furaffinity.net/view/6347137
the foreshortening gives it away
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:35 am (UTC)It just doesn't look right.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 03:40 am (UTC)(Links are NSFW)
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/2493464/
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/3590820/
no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 01:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 04:04 am (UTC)This itself is not proof of tracing, but highly referenced I think is pretty clear.
The other thing that makes me kinda weary is how he can make a very nicely detailed picture one moment, and then one that isnt as high of quality the next.
Its not enough to make me point out Thief, but it does cause me to want to tread lightly when dealing with such a person.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 10:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 08:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 09:33 am (UTC)I do think that people should be told if he is tracing. I wouldn't want to buy a traced commission regardless of what it was traced off of.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 10:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 09:38 am (UTC)He could probably do some really great stuff if he could cast aside his crutches and learn to draw for himself.
Beware well earned.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 11:08 am (UTC)http://www.furaffinity.net/view/5895373/
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/4757605/ (NSFW)
no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 01:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-25 09:14 pm (UTC)He simply stated that your art needed work but was still good.
Than you straight up used 'Shit' to describe whats in his gallery.
Traced or not, that's completely uncalled for and rude.
You didn't even have a confession of tracing at that moment and you insulted him over a couple of words.
As well, your telling everyone who has commissioned him to ask for a refund? What of the commissions he said were 'fully original'?
no subject
Date: 2011-10-26 10:06 am (UTC)To be honest, if he is tracing, he isn't very good at it... He seems to be at a very basic level with his art.
Mod Notice
Date: 2011-10-27 01:52 am (UTC)Please feel free to continue your discussion there!
no subject
Date: 2011-10-27 07:25 pm (UTC)Looks like the head and some of the anatomy came from
http://www.unicornlady.net/Gallery/images/18/grove_of_the_sun_copyright_h_kyoht_luterman.jpg