Mod Post: Harassment is Unacceptable
Dec. 12th, 2011 02:08 pmIt has come to our attention that a few of you have forgotten a very important policy regarding our community. It is one we've had to enforce way too much, way too recently and this is not a good thing.
Once again, to make things completely clear to everyone here:
Artists Beware does not, can not, and most certainly will not ever condone harassment of community users or of individuals posted here.
See Rule #2 in our Community Profile.
Going to another person's LJ/FA/DA/Tumblr/email/etc. to pester them over anything that has occurred in this community is a big fat freaking NO. What we are is a community for knowledge and professionalism. What we are not is an attack dog community.
There are reasons we do not let this kind of behavior stand in A_B. First of all, it goes against LiveJournal's abuse policies. They don't allow it, so we most certainly aren't either. Second of all, it creates a bad aura around our community, and gives people every right to attempt to label A_B as a 'drama comm' - which we are not! It is already very difficult to gauge which entries are going to cause what reaction, so users of A_B going after OPs or featured parties makes things all around harder.
While we moderators can understand information flying around faster these days with things like Twitter and Tumblr about, please just LOOK at where the information began before deciding you want to join in with the so-called lynch mob. If it originated here at Artists Beware, do everyone a favor and keep your hands off. And conversely, if you have no desire to avoid the drama and want to dive in head first? Don't come into Artists Beware to continue what you started off-community. Period. Either way, you WILL be punished if you're caught.
Lastly, I want to point out that there are six moderators in our community. All of us very active and easily accessible. There is no need for anyone to go so far as to attack another user in this community, in the event someone messes up. You come to us and we will handle it for you.
TL;DR, harassment of anyone in A_B is forbidden! Anyone caught will be warned or banned.
Once again, to make things completely clear to everyone here:
Artists Beware does not, can not, and most certainly will not ever condone harassment of community users or of individuals posted here.
Going to another person's LJ/FA/DA/Tumblr/email/etc. to pester them over anything that has occurred in this community is a big fat freaking NO. What we are is a community for knowledge and professionalism. What we are not is an attack dog community.
There are reasons we do not let this kind of behavior stand in A_B. First of all, it goes against LiveJournal's abuse policies. They don't allow it, so we most certainly aren't either. Second of all, it creates a bad aura around our community, and gives people every right to attempt to label A_B as a 'drama comm' - which we are not! It is already very difficult to gauge which entries are going to cause what reaction, so users of A_B going after OPs or featured parties makes things all around harder.
While we moderators can understand information flying around faster these days with things like Twitter and Tumblr about, please just LOOK at where the information began before deciding you want to join in with the so-called lynch mob. If it originated here at Artists Beware, do everyone a favor and keep your hands off. And conversely, if you have no desire to avoid the drama and want to dive in head first? Don't come into Artists Beware to continue what you started off-community. Period. Either way, you WILL be punished if you're caught.
Lastly, I want to point out that there are six moderators in our community. All of us very active and easily accessible. There is no need for anyone to go so far as to attack another user in this community, in the event someone messes up. You come to us and we will handle it for you.
TL;DR, harassment of anyone in A_B is forbidden! Anyone caught will be warned or banned.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-12 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 01:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 01:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 12:41 am (UTC)Since that time I have watched as this community turned into a drama mob, tearing into artists for minor infractions and smearing their character even after they apologize. Who does THAT help? And the atrocious levels of unwarranted venom at the accused artists has made me turn White Knight more than once.
For some time now, I have wanted to leave this community because it was more about 'ATTACK THE SINNER' than helping artists. If we can turn this thing around again, back to how things originally were, it would gladden not just my heart but many others.
Thanks for being concerned.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 12:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 01:14 am (UTC)Like I have stated in the actual entry - it is very hard to gauge what will and what will not blow up because there are so many unfortunate factors at play be it attitude from the OP, from the featured person, outside sources (non-A_B related) and uninformed individuals who sit there and pin this very comm as a drama mob that allow things to get heated.
Just focus on policing yourself, and maybe politely informing the misinformed (as long as they're not featured here) that their perceptions of A_B do more harm than good, since it is those who crow the worst of it all that have invited the unsavory element here.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:do unto others
From:Re: do unto others
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 06:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 04:53 am (UTC)If you need proof, go take a sample of (valid!) posts from a few years back - most start exactly the same way:
Someone posts a negative experience, provides evidence of someone engaging in reprehensible behaviour.
The first comments, will be either people asking for evidence if insufficient was provided, or saying "wow, that's horrible, sorry you had to deal with that!", etc.
( ^This is a normal reaction. People will almost always react negatively when shown evidence of really bad behaviour. This hasn't changed! )
Then, if the artist or a friend chimes in and acts civilly, the conversation turns to investigation and often apology. In these cases the situation is often resolved quickly and rationally.
In cases where the accused turns to denial, "it was a social experiment", name-calling, bashing, counter-attacking... It all goes to poop. The fact we've seen a few of these lately, especially related to tracing posts, doesn't mean the community's changed, just that people are getting better at recognising certain patterns in behaviour.
To me, this is actually heartening! Of course, nobody wants to be posted here, especially if it's not warranted. Thing is, if it really isn't, it's far more likely than not you'll be able to provide evidence that you're not the criminal mastermind you're being portrayed as. If you can bring yourself to ignore the ubiquitous "wow, that's horrible!" comments at the beginning of every post, you've got every chance to bring your own view to the table, and in many cases we see the accused person become the 'good guy' as it were, and the original post becomes a beware against the OP.
In short, it's about investigating claims, not getting emotionally involved with comments. Sure, people get heated, but if you look in, it's usually AFTER someone's come in, flung about some proverbial poo and caused people to become understandably peeved. Not that this is a good thing at all (or what always happens... we're human after all), but there's plenty of evidence that if people keep their heads then things are handled civilly and with minimal fuss.
Uh, my slightly-more-than-two cents there, sorry for tl'dr :P
no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 05:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 08:29 am (UTC)The shift that did occur in the community is one from artists_beware (of flakey commissioners) to artists_to_beware_of. It still covers both, it always has, but I recall the ratio of posts back then being more towards the former.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 05:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 06:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 06:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 06:06 am (UTC)Its why you're better off leaving A_B alone if you've gotten yourself knee deep in it elsewhere.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 06:56 am (UTC)I mean - if someone comes in here flaming on about some terrible experience and link us back to lulz or another drama pit for all their evidence requirements, then I can't see the post making it through moderation. If the same evidence is taken on its own merits, then it doesn't really matter if it's been posted before elsewhere as some people here don't frequent those kinds of places, and will therefore take it at face value without their opinions being coloured by any previous viewings - which is how it should all be taken anyway!
no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 07:26 am (UTC)Many kudos to the mods!
no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 08:06 am (UTC)It's kind of a gossipy subject in and of itself since art communities can be so tight... I mean I know there was a recent entry that my girlfriend and I kept an eye on because it involved someone we knew indirectly (she had a commission from the artist in queue as well), and we couldn't help but talk about it because we were really shocked. I don't think either of us commented on it because we found it to be in poor taste, but that sort of situation pops into my head when people talk about a_b being sort of a "drama" community.
In any case, I personally feel like you moderators are doing a great job handling things here, despite the strange uproars that happen once in a while, and you guys are very fair in what you permit and encourage and what you discourage. :] Keep up the good work!
no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 10:44 am (UTC)November was definitely an anomaly in A_B. I think it can recover though. A lot of people not in the comm don't seem to understand that this isn't a drama comm, and I'd be happy enough to set the record straight.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 12:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 03:11 pm (UTC)Does that also count for comments clearly not intended to harass? Just because someone coming from AB + leaving any type of comment = always harassment?
no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 05:19 pm (UTC)We're aware that this happens and that's why less people end up actually getting banned because of this rule. If you know there's been an AB made you're better off not commenting, but if you've commented already and tell us you found it from somewhere else when we talk to you about it, we generally have to take your word for it. But if someone comes on the AB post, goes 'Wow what a jerk' and then goes to that person page and goes 'YOU'RE A JERK', they're going to get in trouble because it'll be fairly obvious they came from AB.
Does that also count for comments clearly not intended to harass? Just because someone coming from AB + leaving any type of comment = always harassment?
We stress no contact at all, even attempts to be helpful or neutral because it's not up to us to decide what's harassment. Some of these people might see any contact at all as harassment (such as Kraven). It's not something we can control from our side, so it's safer to just not do it at all so the comm doesn't get shut down.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 08:11 pm (UTC)Also, can we get a link to/excerpt from the actual rule in LJ's terms that outlines what is and is not acceptable behavior in this regard? I couldn't find anything specific toward communities when I looked.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 08:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:tl;dr, hypothetical scenario
From:Re: tl;dr, hypothetical scenario
From:Re: tl;dr, hypothetical scenario
From:Re: tl;dr, hypothetical scenario
From:Re: tl;dr, hypothetical scenario
From:Re: tl;dr, hypothetical scenario
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 10:44 pm (UTC)What's the code to view it with my own theme?
no subject
Date: 2011-12-13 10:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:Surprise green was surprising.
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-12-14 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-14 12:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-12-14 07:06 pm (UTC)He definitely went WAAAY too far off journal and earned his permaban, don't get me wrong, but he posted a perfectly valid beware and when it was discovered that he was missing a piece of information, some commenters flipped out and essentially started accusing him of lying, he got defensive, people started saying they were blacklisting him because of his attitude (which is, honestly, how a LOT of people would react, including myself), then he started flinging insults. Keep in mind that in the end, he wasn't even lying about anything, Shiuk never came and debated the fact AND he got a refund. That is NOT fair in my eyes.
It really makes me mad when I see those kinds of posts because it makes me afraid to EVER post anything in the future here, for fear that a popular or well-known poster will disagree with me or accuse me of something ridiculous and a bunch of other people are gonna jump on the bandwagon in support... that I'm gonna get "blacklisted" for no reason and have a bunch of people come harass me on my page. I'm sure you guys are well aware of how easy A_B can ruin someone's reputation. It's happened already to other posters, and when you guys allow these comments to get out of hand that's when the harassment on the OP starts, because they think the community agrees with them.
It's not right, no, but there must be some truth to it since you have to make this kind of entry in the first place!
I hope I'm making sense, I'm not going to finger point anyone specifically but that is just my observation. Those types of comments seriously cause a lot of drama, and I'm starting to look at A_B as a drama community myself, and I really, REALLY don't want that. PLEASE do something about these comments, I really think they will help cut down any drama bombs in the future.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-14 07:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-12-15 09:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-15 09:25 am (UTC)As for cancelling any sort of commissions, you have every right to do it. Just, giving reasons is pretty much by your own choice. There really doesn't NEED to be a reason to tell anyone 'your post on A_B makes me want to head for the hills - I'm cancelling this commission'. A simple 'I am no longer comfortable to continue this commission, therefore I am cancelling' will suffice - and possibly cause as little damage as possible in the end.
Its really all about the result you want, and if you're trying to back away from a dramateer - a quiet exit is best.
(no subject)
From: