[identity profile] slushienyappy.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] artists_beware
Hello A_B! 
I hope I'am submitting this correctly.

I recently started a new business where I can print on shirts,bags, etc. There is a certain anime I have grown very fond of and in this anime there is an emblem that the main character has. I was concerned about printing this emblem on shirts and selling them. Would it be against copyright laws? 

I have seen buttons and various other items on Etsy with the same image being sold...So I figured maybe it was okay! But I still want to be on the safe side so I figured I would ask you guys since you seem very wise :).

I dunno if it will matter much but the anime is called "Tiger and bunny" and the emblem is this http://plamoya.com/bmz_cache/d/d984b749dc6799e97f12b7a3fdd9dac6.image.500x500.jpg

T
hank you guys so much for your time!

Date: 2012-07-30 11:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lovelesskiax.livejournal.com
I think it's basically along the lines of regular fan art: It's technically illegal, but the company won't step in as long as you aren't cutting into their own profits.

Date: 2012-07-30 11:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eveshka.livejournal.com
You could get sued by the company that has the rights. It would likely start with a polite legal letter asking you to cease and desist... but if Tiger and Bunny is a Disney property, you wouldn't even get that.

Some companies don't mind... but others are jealous of every penny they might have made.

I would caution against it.

Date: 2012-07-30 11:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chronidu.livejournal.com
It's not even Jealousy on any part to be honest. It's more often than not protecting their legal property, and the image of it.

Being a big company does not suddenly mean they don't own the rights to their products and property, and doesn't suddenly make them greedy on any level for trying to protect and enforce said rights.

Date: 2012-07-30 11:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chronidu.livejournal.com
No worries! Best of luck with your store C:

Date: 2012-07-31 03:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] taasla.livejournal.com
Especially considering that rights can disappear if they don't defend their trademarks.

Date: 2012-07-31 03:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thistle-chaser.livejournal.com
This, yeah. A copyright owner has to protect their claim or they lose the right to hold it.

Date: 2012-07-30 11:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lovelesskiax.livejournal.com
If you're using the logo directly, yes, that'll get you in huge trouble. If you draw it yourself, well...I'd still advise against it.

If you're really looking to make something with the logo on it, I'd recommend finding a way to parody it. As long as it can fall under parody copyright, it should be fine.

And example would be changing the color, and adding bunny ears to the logo, so it's easily relatable to T&B, but not an image officially owned or endorsed by the company. Granted, you'd still want to draw it all yourself.

Also sorry, kinda rambled, LOL.

Date: 2012-07-30 11:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chronidu.livejournal.com
Technically yes, reproducing this trade marked character/emblem/art would make it illegal to make and sell, especially in a case like this where its potentially mass reproductions as apposed to a one of a kind piece.

Whether the company will come after you over it, who knows, it's really on you if you want to sell a product that is not trademarked by yourself, but in the off chance the company steps in, you would be guilty on all parts and essentially at their mercy of what they want to do legally.

Out of curiosity, are you even making the emblem yourself?

Date: 2012-07-30 11:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chronidu.livejournal.com
Okay then yeah I would definitely advice against it, as it is also a trademarked emblem in itself. Even if the company itself doesn't come after you, a report to Etsy could have you shut down for infringement.

However, another idea that you could maybe do is something like a cute custom design of a tiger and a bunny for instance. Being that they would just be animals, the art would be completely yours to do what you please with, but fans of the series would probably still get the reference. Things like that could be something to think about if you want to still do a sort of fan product, hope this helps!

Date: 2012-07-30 11:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iinkwell.livejournal.com
This is a bit of a touch and go subject.
Considering at cons, people make 'fanart' stickers and buttons and sell them all the time and never seem to get repercussions.

That's only IF you're remaking the image and not just copy-pasta-printing their version of the image straight from the net.

Doing THAT could get you in major trouble. But the printed stickers/buttons that you've done of fanart yourself rarely ever get you into trouble, unless you're dealing with Hussie and the Homestuck company at large.

Date: 2012-07-30 11:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chronidu.livejournal.com
It should be to note that legally it is still not okay though, your own art or not. It's another case of legally you are in the wrong, but will the company act.

Unfortunately Mspaintadventures and Andrew Hussie is another case of where an Artist dares to actually enact his rights over his property and creations, and kids who want to make money off of his creations throw fits because he won't let them. Legally they have no right to make a penny off of homestuck, but for some reason they feel they are obligated or entitled to sell Art or Products of characters and a creations they do not own.

It should be to note that I speak as a person who has done fan art on commission, and know openly that what I did was not legal, and should the owners of the characters seek me out for it I would be in the wrong with no leg to stand on.

Date: 2012-07-30 11:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iinkwell.livejournal.com
Personal or private use with no intention to sell IS legal actually. As long as you make no profit off of it, you're in the clear.

I know a lot of people actually use Homestuck merch, just as an example since we were talking about them, to TRADE for things or give as free gifts to promote themselves at cons. I know of a few people off the top of my head that trade merch for food from other congoers.

Date: 2012-07-31 12:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chronidu.livejournal.com
Again, keep in mind this is all technically speaking, but yes producing their emblem for yourself would still be stepping on legal toes technically haha. That said, I'll be totally honest with you and say I really can't see anyone seeking you out for making a T shirt for yourself, or even really getting upset. The real issues come with typically mass producing a trademarked character/piece/etc for sale/trade.

I know I myself have ended up just making my own shirts of trademarked things/characters when they either ended up costing too much to buy or just didn't exist how I would like them for sale. This of course doesn't make it legally right, but I just figured I should put it out there if it helps.

Date: 2013-06-07 06:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mottenfest.livejournal.com
I know this is a super old discussion, but I still wanted to tip my hat to you. Well said.

Date: 2012-07-31 12:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ljmydayaway.livejournal.com
As long as Funimation isn't the one releasing Tiger and Bunny in the US, then you're not likely to get sued.

The rest of the anime companies are too small and really can't afford to sue anyone. Even if they did, they'd send you a Cease and Desist letter before wasting money to sue you over tiny sticker profits.

Date: 2012-07-31 01:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xenafox.livejournal.com
The dub is out next year =3 So yea, it'll be released in the U.S.

I literally have nothing to add except HELL YEA TIGER AND BUNNY. *Brofist*

Date: 2012-07-31 09:10 am (UTC)
moonreviews: Kagome from Inuyasha (kagome-rain)
From: [personal profile] moonreviews
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiger_and_Bunny
Wikipedia says it's licensed by VIZ, Kaze and Siren Visual (VIZ being the only one in the US).

Date: 2012-08-05 01:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paulownia.livejournal.com
It's Viz and unlike their other releases they actually have the license for character goods and merchandise. See
http://www.viz.com/content/viz-media-announces-product-license-hot-new-anime-action-series-tiger-bunny

THis is not the usual situation so be careful. Avoid using the logos (as others have said, this involves TM not just copyright) and I would really be careful about selling any fanstuff if they're present.

Date: 2012-07-31 02:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hellebore.livejournal.com
Ifs and buts aside, it's not something I would personally risk. I've had someone take my work and use it in advertising and when I found out, I sent a cease and desist. The more you protect your rights early on, the more seriously a court will take you if you go to sue someone. And you never know, the anime company might wind up doing the same.

Date: 2012-07-31 03:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neolucky.livejournal.com
I honestly wouldn't. Perhaps you can make a fanart/logo that represents your enjoyment of the anime, or something else that might make fans happy! But I wouldn't use anything you didn't create yourself, especially if you respect the anime it's coming from and it's creators.

Just best not to do it in general.

Trade-marks =/= copyright

Date: 2012-07-31 06:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] animehoneybee.livejournal.com
Trade-marks and copyright are NOT the same thing and have very different laws governing each, though they are both forms of intellectual property and an image like this may have both attached to it.

I would advise you NOT to sell it. Copyright infringement, fanart, and selling fanart are somewhat grey areas, but trade-marks are pretty seriously regulated(which is why a lot of cons will allow fanart, but do not allow you to sell anything which has the logo of the series in question).

Trade-marks are, as the name suggests, marks in trade. They are meant to distinguish one company or manufacturer's goods/product from another's. They are meant to protect goods and products from being 'passed off' by giving the company's 'stamp of approval' or 'official seal' in the form of an image, logo, mascot, etc.

If you sell a product with another company's trade-mark, you can be charged with passing off and/or counterfeiting. (As a side note, fashion trends do not have copyright attached to them and anyone can make and sell an exact copy of a Louis Vitton handbag, AS LONG AS they do not copy the their trade-mark. A 'knock-off' is one which tries to pretend to be the real thing by replicating the trade-mark).

In your particular case, I do not know if this is a 'fake' logo that they made up for a group or company within the anime. If so, then it's not really a trade-mark and falls under copyright. If the company has ever used that mark to promote a product or a line of products, then it will be trade-marked most likely (like the tri-force symbol in Zelda).

I would infringe copyright a heck of a lot soon than I would infringe trade-marks, so be warned.

Re: Trade-marks =/= copyright

Date: 2012-07-31 06:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xenafox.livejournal.com
The symbol they're showing is used by Wild Tiger, a character in the series. It's used on some of the Wild Tiger merchandise sold irl. It is used to represent the character so I think it just falls under the fake logo thing you were talking about. Buuut...I'm not sure. I dunno if technically it promotes a Wild Tiger product line or not since A. it's from inside the show and B. Like I said its on some merchandise but not all.

It's kind of trippy in that the series has a lot of real logos/trademarks that exist for companies in the real world, and then they have their made up ones....

Sorry if I am rambling and don't make much sense, it's just that it's almost 3 AM x.x; Curious about how some of this would work though, like I think if they just wanted to sell the symbol and nothing with it yea that's not a good way to go.

Re: Trade-marks =/= copyright

Date: 2012-07-31 01:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] animehoneybee.livejournal.com
That's kind of interesting. I've heard it's a good show. Chances are, if they've made products featuring it, they've probbbabbly trade-marked it. If you have any links to their products featuring the symbol you might be able to tell by zooming in or otherwise looking for the TM symbol, though it's not always present and it's usually very tiny.

Re: Trade-marks =/= copyright

Date: 2012-07-31 01:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] animehoneybee.livejournal.com
No problem! I think making something for yourself like that is fine. It's the 'passing off' aka tricking-people-into-thinking-it's-real that they are worried about.

Companies also heavily police their trade-marks because it is necessary to avoid what is called 'dilution'. It's happened to products like Q-tip and Band-aid, where they didn't keep their trade-name (closely related to trade-mark, same area) separate from other competing products and people eventually called every cotton swab Q-tip and every adhesive bandage a band-aid, so they actually lost their rights to the names (which is why Band-aid promotes themselves as 'Band-aid BRAND' lol).

A LOT of people on the internet confuse trade-marks and copyright or use the terms interchangeably, but they're very different, just overlap sometimes :)

Date: 2012-07-31 10:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thaily.livejournal.com
Copying an emblem is not fanart, printing and selling it is just theft. Don't do it.

Date: 2012-07-31 10:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rtydmartel.livejournal.com
Etsy is a terrible measuring stick for copyright and legality in general.

There are many legitimate sellers and artists there, so this isn't a knock against them, but there are also many shops selling things that technically they shouldn't (using the site to resell mass-manufactured items when that's against the rules, selling items that contain copyrighted images, claiming to sell handmade items when they're really not, etc.).

For examples, see this:

http://www.regretsy.com/category/not-remotely-handmade/page/2/

And this:

http://www.regretsy.com/category/copyright-infringements/page/4/

(Warning: there are some Not Safe For Work images (nudity and the like) in the site, if you want to see other sections of it.)

Date: 2012-07-31 10:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rtydmartel.livejournal.com
You're welcome!

I forgot to warn you, some entries have swearing too. I forgot to mention that, sorry.

Profile

artists_beware: (Default)
Commissioner & Artist, Warning & Kudos Community

December 2017

S M T W T F S
      12
3456789
10 11 1213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Nov. 3rd, 2025 05:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios